Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32399070›Full record

ArticleCognitive neurodynamics2020

Machine classification of spatiotemporal patterns: automated parameter search in a rebounding spiking network.

Lawrence Oprea, Christopher C Pack, Anmar Khadra

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cognitive neurodynamics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lawrence Oprea1Department of Physiology, McGill University, Montréal, QC Canada.
Christopher C Pack2Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, McGill University, Montréal, QC Canada.
Anmar Khadra1Department of Physiology, McGill University, Montréal, QC Canada.
McGill University · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Various patterns of electrical activities, including travelling waves, have been observed in cortical experimental data from animal models as well as humans. By applying machine learning techniques, we investigate the spatiotemporal patterns, found in a spiking neuronal network with inhibition-induced firing (rebounding). Our cortical sheet model produces a wide variety of network activities including synchrony, target waves, and travelling wavelets. Pattern formation is controlled by modifying a Gaussian derivative coupling kernel through varying the level of inhibition, coupling strength, and kernel geometry. We have designed a computationally efficient machine classifier, based on statistical, textural, and temporal features, to identify the parameter regimes associated with different spatiotemporal patterns. Our results reveal that switching between synchrony and travelling waves can occur transiently and spontaneously without a stimulus, in a noise-dependent fashion, or in the presence of stimulus when the coupling strength and level of inhibition are at moderate values. They also demonstrate that when a target wave is formed, its wave speed is most sensitive to perturbations in the coupling strength between model neurons. This study provides an automated method to characterize activities produced by a novel spiking network that phenomenologically models large scale dynamics in the cortex.

Indexed as

Fast switching in neural activityGaussian coupling kernelIzhikevich spiking modelRebounding neuronal networkSpatiotemporal patternsSupervised learningSynchrony and travelling waves

Identifiers

PMID32399070
PMCPMC7203379
OpenAlexW2999715747

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.