Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32398783›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

The usefulness of the Deep Learning method of variational autoencoder to reduce measurement noise in glaucomatous visual fields.

Ryo Asaoka, Hiroshi Murata, Shotaro Asano, Masato Matsuura, Yuri Fujino, Atsuya Miki, Masaki Tanito, Shiro Mizoue, Kazuhiko Mori, Katsuyoshi Suzuki and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Ryo AsaokaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Graduate School of Medicine and Faculty of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan. rasaoka-tky@umin.ac.jp.
Hiroshi MurataDepartment of Ophthalmology, Graduate School of Medicine and Faculty of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan.
Shotaro AsanoDepartment of Ophthalmology, Graduate School of Medicine and Faculty of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan.
Masato MatsuuraDepartment of Ophthalmology, Graduate School of Medicine and Faculty of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan.
Yuri FujinoDepartment of Ophthalmology, Graduate School of Medicine and Faculty of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan.
Atsuya MikiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan.
Masaki TanitoDepartment of Ophthalmology, Shimane University Faculty of Medicine, Shimane, 693-8501, Japan.
Shiro MizoueDepartment of Ophthalmology, Ehime University Graduate School of Medicine, Ehime, 791-0295, Japan.
Kazuhiko MoriDepartment of Ophthalmology, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, 602-8566, Japan.
Katsuyoshi SuzukiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Yamaguchi University Graduate School of Medicine, Yamaguchi, 755-0046, Japan.
Takehiro YamashitaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Kagoshima University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Kagoshima, 890-0075, Japan.
Kenji KashiwagiDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Yamanashi Faculty of Medicine, Yamanashi, 409-3898, Japan.
Nobuyuki ShojiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kitasato University, Kanagawa, 252-0374, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of the study was to investigate the usefulness of processing visual field (VF) using a variational autoencoder (VAE). The training data consisted of 82,433 VFs from 16,836 eyes. Testing dataset 1 consisted of test-retest VFs from 104 eyes with open angle glaucoma. Testing dataset 2 was series of 10 VFs from 638 eyes with open angle glaucoma. A VAE model to reconstruct VF was developed using the training dataset. VFs in the testing dataset 1 were then reconstructed using the trained VAE and the mean total deviation (mTD) was calculated (mTD

Indexed as

Deep LearningAdultDisease ProgressionEyeFemaleGlaucoma, Open-AngleHumansIntraocular PressureLinear ModelsMaleMiddle AgedReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificityVisual FieldsVisual Field Tests

Identifiers

PMID32398783
PMCPMC7217822

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.