ArticleNature communications2020
Integration of multiple biological contexts reveals principles of synthetic lethality that affect reproducibility.
Article in Nature communications, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.
- Synthetic lethality in cancer drug discovery: challenges and opportunities.Nature reviews. Drug discovery · 2026Review
- Context-aware gene dependency modeling via graph attention networks for precision oncology.Journal of translational medicine · 2025Article
- Interpretable high-order knowledge graph neural network for predicting synthetic lethality in human cancers.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2025Article
- PRODE recovers essential and context-essential genes through neighborhood-informed scores.Genome biology · 2025Article
- Graph based recurrent network for context specific synthetic lethality prediction.Science China. Life sciences · 2025Article
- Advances in Synthetic Lethality in Potential Oncology Therapeutic Approaches.Current topics in medicinal chemistry · 2025Review
- Targeting synthetic lethality: an effective therapeutic approach in ovarian and endometrial cancers.Therapeutic advances in medical oncology · 2025Review
- Synthetic lethal strategies for the development of cancer therapeutics.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2025Review
- An interpretable artificial intelligence framework for designing synthetic lethality-based anti-cancer combination therapies.Journal of advanced research · 2024Article
- PARP-1 selectively impairsGut · 2024Article
- Complex synthetic lethality in cancer.Nature genetics · 2023Review
- Synthetic lethal approaches to target cancers with loss of PTEN function.Genes & diseases · 2023Article
- Targeting small GTPases: emerging grasps on previously untamable targets, pioneered by KRAS.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2023Review
- Synthetic lethality prediction in DNA damage repair, chromatin remodeling and the cell cycle using multi-omics data from cell lines and patients.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Multi-level characteristics recognition of cancer core therapeutic targets and drug screening for a broader patient population.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2023Article
- Metabolic collateral lethal target identification reveals MTHFD2 paralogue dependency in ovarian cancer.Nature metabolism · 2022Article
- Computational methods, databases and tools for synthetic lethality prediction.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2022Review
- Review
- Integrative Analysis of Next-Generation Sequencing for Next-Generation Cancer Research toward Artificial Intelligence.Cancers · 2021Review
- Targeting KRAS: The Elephant in the Room of Epithelial Cancers.Frontiers in oncology · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Synthetic lethal screens have the potential to identify new vulnerabilities incurred by specific cancer mutations but have been hindered by lack of agreement between studies. In the case of KRAS, we identify that published synthetic lethal screen hits significantly overlap at the pathway rather than gene level. Analysis of pathways encoded as protein networks could identify synthetic lethal candidates that are more reproducible than those previously reported. Lack of overlap likely stems from biological rather than technical limitations as most synthetic lethal phenotypes are strongly modulated by changes in cellular conditions or genetic context, the latter determined using a pairwise genetic interaction map that identifies numerous interactions that suppress synthetic lethal effects. Accounting for pathway, cellular and genetic context nominates a DNA repair dependency in KRAS-mutant cells, mediated by a network containing BRCA1. We provide evidence for why most reported synthetic lethals are not reproducible which is addressable using a multi-faceted testing framework.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.