ArticleGenetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics2020
The leadership behaviors needed to implement clinical genomics at scale: a qualitative study.
Article in Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Determining the value of genomics in healthcare.Nature medicine · 2025Review
- Safe and effective genomic medicine implementation in hospitals: a scoping review.BMJ open quality · 2025Article
- Readiness and leadership for the implementation of polygenic risk scores: Genetic healthcare providers' perspectives in the hereditary cancer context.Journal of genetic counseling · 2025Article
- Using implementation science to navigate the complexity of integrating genomics into healthcare.Nature medicine · 2025Article
- Adopting Public Health Genomics when the House Is on Fire: How Will We Navigate to 2030?Public health genomics · 2025Article
- Combining Implementation and Data Sciences to Accelerate Evidence Integration into Healthcare - ImpleMATE.F1000Research · 2025Article
- Building a Genomics-Informed Nursing Workforce: Recommendations for Oncology Nursing Practice and Beyond.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2024Article
- Healthcare leaders navigating complexity: a scoping review of key trends in future roles and competencies.BMC medical education · 2024Article
- Developing leadership competencies for genomics integration through globally networked learning and education.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Article
- Aligning intuition and theory: a novel approach to identifying the determinants of behaviours necessary to support implementation of evidence into practice.Implementation science : IS · 2023Article
- Australian Genomics: Outcomes of a 5-year national program to accelerate the integration of genomics in healthcare.American journal of human genetics · 2023Review
- Changes in genetic variant results over time in pediatric cardiomyopathy and electrophysiology.Journal of genetic counseling · 2021Article
- Learning from scaling up ultra-rapid genomic testing for critically ill children to a national level.NPJ genomic medicine · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo investigate leadership in clinical genomics and identify likely implications of different leadership approaches for future implementation of clinical genomics.
methodsWe undertook 37 interviews in a cross-sectional qualitative study examining implementation of clinical genomics in Australia. Participants were either nongenetic medical specialists working with genomic initiatives (e.g., immunologists, nephrologists) or working at a service/organizational level (e.g., department heads, chief medical officers). We identified participants as genomic migrants (long-established practitioners) and genomic natives (those medical specialists coming into independent practice with genomic technology in situ). Data were analyzed deductively with reference to leadership approach.
resultsLeadership approaches were often blended or reported to iteratively support development of another. There was concern at both the absence or the excess of entrepreneurial leadership (i.e., risk-taking).
conclusionEntrepreneurial leadership is needed to promote innovativeness, risk-taking, and proactivity, essential in these early stages of clinical genomics. Shared decision-making is required from a wide range of clinicians, calling for both clinical and distributed leadership. Sharing leadership, and the potential loss of positional status from formal senior positions, may prove challenging to genomics "migrants," who are essential for nurturing genomic "natives." Clinicians will need support from their organizations and professional bodies to manage the transition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.