Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32398772›Full record

ArticleGenetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics2020

The leadership behaviors needed to implement clinical genomics at scale: a qualitative study.

Stephanie Best, Zornitza Stark, Helen Brown, Janet C Long, Kushani Hewage, Clara Gaff, Jeffrey Braithwaite, Natalie Taylor

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Stephanie BestMacquarie University, Sydney, Australia. stephanie.best@mq.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1107-8976
Zornitza StarkAustralian Genomics Health Alliance, Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia.
Helen BrownMelbourne Genomics Health Alliance, Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Melbourne, Australia.
Janet C LongMacquarie University, Sydney, Australia.
Kushani HewageAustralian Genomics Health Alliance, Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia.
Clara GaffMelbourne Genomics Health Alliance, Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Melbourne, Australia.
Jeffrey BraithwaiteMacquarie University, Sydney, Australia.
Natalie TaylorCancer Research Division, Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo investigate leadership in clinical genomics and identify likely implications of different leadership approaches for future implementation of clinical genomics.

methodsWe undertook 37 interviews in a cross-sectional qualitative study examining implementation of clinical genomics in Australia. Participants were either nongenetic medical specialists working with genomic initiatives (e.g., immunologists, nephrologists) or working at a service/organizational level (e.g., department heads, chief medical officers). We identified participants as genomic migrants (long-established practitioners) and genomic natives (those medical specialists coming into independent practice with genomic technology in situ). Data were analyzed deductively with reference to leadership approach.

resultsLeadership approaches were often blended or reported to iteratively support development of another. There was concern at both the absence or the excess of entrepreneurial leadership (i.e., risk-taking).

conclusionEntrepreneurial leadership is needed to promote innovativeness, risk-taking, and proactivity, essential in these early stages of clinical genomics. Shared decision-making is required from a wide range of clinicians, calling for both clinical and distributed leadership. Sharing leadership, and the potential loss of positional status from formal senior positions, may prove challenging to genomics "migrants," who are essential for nurturing genomic "natives." Clinicians will need support from their organizations and professional bodies to manage the transition.

Indexed as

GenomicsLeadershipAustraliaCross-Sectional StudiesQualitative Researchentrepreneurial leadershipgenomicsgenomics migrantsgenomics nativesleadership

Identifiers

PMID32398772
PMCPMC7394877

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.