Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32398757›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

Long-term effects of straw return and straw-derived biochar amendment on bacterial communities in soil aggregates.

Naling Bai, Hanlin Zhang, Sheng Zhou, Huifeng Sun, Yuhua Zhao, Xianqing Zheng, Shuangxi Li, Juanqin Zhang, Weiguang Lv

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
6.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 83 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Naling Bai *Eco-environmental Protection Research Institute, Shanghai Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shanghai, 201403, China.
Hanlin Zhang *Eco-environmental Protection Research Institute, Shanghai Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shanghai, 201403, China.
Sheng ZhouEco-environmental Protection Research Institute, Shanghai Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shanghai, 201403, China.
Huifeng SunEco-environmental Protection Research Institute, Shanghai Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shanghai, 201403, China.
Yuhua ZhaoInstitute of Biochemistry, College of Life Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310058, China.
Xianqing ZhengEco-environmental Protection Research Institute, Shanghai Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shanghai, 201403, China.
Shuangxi LiEco-environmental Protection Research Institute, Shanghai Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shanghai, 201403, China.
Juanqin ZhangEco-environmental Protection Research Institute, Shanghai Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shanghai, 201403, China.
Weiguang LvEco-environmental Protection Research Institute, Shanghai Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shanghai, 201403, China. lvweiguang@saas.sh.cn.
Shanghai Academy of Agricultural Sciences · CNFarmland Irrigation Research Institute · CNZhejiang University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Improving soil structure, fertility, and production is of major concern for establishing sustainable agroecosystems. Further research is needed to evaluate whether different methods of straw returning determine the variations of soil aggregation and the microbial community in aggregates in the long term. In this study, we comparatively investigated the effects of long-term fertilization regimes performed over six years, namely, non-fertilization (CK), chemical fertilization (CF), continuous straw return (CS), and continuous straw-derived biochar amendment (CB), on soil aggregation and bacterial communities in rice-wheat rotation systems. The results showed that straw/biochar application increased soil nutrient content and soil aggregate size distribution and stability at both 0-20 cm and 20-40 cm soil depths, compared with those of CF and CK; CB performed better than CS. CB increased bacterial community diversity and richness in 0-20 cm soil, and evenness in 0-40 cm soil (p < 0.05); CS had no significant effect on these aspects. Variations in the relative abundance of Actinobacteria, Chloroflexi, Bacteroidetes, Nitrospirae, Gemmatimonadetes, and Latescibacteria in specific aggregates confirmed the different effects of straw/biochar on bacterial community structure. The partial least squares discrimination analysis and permutation multivariate analysis of variance revealed that fertilization, aggregate size fractions, and soil depth affected the bacterial community, although their effects differed. This study suggests that CB may reduce chemical fertilizer usage and improve the sustainability of rice-wheat cropping systems over the long term, with a better overall outcome than CS.

Indexed as

AgricultureBacteriaCarbonCharcoalConservation of Natural ResourcesEcosystemFertilizersOryzaSoilSoil MicrobiologyTime FactorsTriticumbiocharCarbonCharcoalFertilizersSoil

Identifiers

PMID32398757
PMCPMC7217948
OpenAlexW3024696338

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.