ReviewCurrent opinion in clinical nutrition and metabolic care2020
Deoxyuracil in DNA in health and disease.
Review in Current opinion in clinical nutrition and metabolic care, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Resolution and Quantitation of Ribonucleosides and Deoxyribonucleosides in Digested Genomic DNA by UHPLC-MS/MS.Biomedical chromatography : BMC · 2026Article
- DNA Damage and Repair in Thyroid Physiology and Disease.Endocrine reviews · 2026Review
- Epigenetic alterations in preeclampsia: a focus on microRNA149 and tetrahydrofolate reductase gene polymorphisms in Egyptian women.Irish journal of medical science · 2024Article
- β-Aminobutyric acid promotes stress tolerance, physiological adjustments, as well as broad epigenetic changes at DNA and RNA nucleobases in field elms (Ulmus minor).BMC plant biology · 2024Article
- Metabolomics in aging research: aging markers from organs.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purpose of reviewGenome instability has long been implicated as a primary causal factor in cancer and diseases of aging. The genome is constantly under attack from extrinsic and intrinsic damaging agents. Uracil misincorporation in DNA and its repair is an intrinsic factor resulting in genomic instability and DNA mutations. Additionally, the presence of uracil in DNA can modify gene expression by interfering with promoter binding and transcription inhibition or upregulation of apoptotic proteins. In immune cells, uracil in DNA drives beneficial genomic diversity for antigen-driven immunity. This review addresses diseases that are linked to uracil accumulation in DNA, its causes, consequences, and the associated biomarkers of risk factors. RECENT
findingsElevated genomic uracil is associated with megaloblastic anemia, neural tube defects, and retroviral immunity. Current evidence supporting causal mechanisms and nutritional interventions that rescue impaired pathways associated with uracil accumulation in DNA are summarized in this review. SUMMARY: Nutritional deficiencies in B vitamins can cause uracil misincorporation into DNA leading to genome instability and associated diseases. Nutritional approaches to preventing uracil accumulation in DNA show some promise to address its associated diseases, but additional randomized controlled trials are needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.