Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32398271›Full record

ArticleTobacco control2020

JUUL targets military personnel and veterans.

Margaret C Fahey, Rebecca A Krukowski, G Wayne Talcott, Melissa A Little

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tobacco control, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. U.S. Military Tobacco and Nicotine Policy Lagging Behind the Times.American journal of preventive medicine · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Determination of Benzoic Acid and Benzyl Alcohol in E-Liquids (JUULContributions to tobacco and nicotine research · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. "Nobody Views It As a Negative Thing to Smoke": A Qualitative Study of the Relationship Between United States Air Force Culture and Tobacco Use.Military psychology : the official journal of the Division of Military Psychology, American Psychological Association · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Margaret C FaheyPsychology, University of Memphis, Memphis, Tennessee, USA mcfahey@memphis.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-8672-8785
Rebecca A KrukowskiDepartment of Preventive Medicine, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, Tennessee, USA.
G Wayne TalcottSchool of Medicine, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.
Melissa A LittleSchool of Medicine, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.

Funding

New, Emerging, and Traditional Tobacco Use in the MilitaryR01DA037273 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA · PI KLESGES, ROBERT C · 2015 to 2019
$3.4M
The Determinants of Tobacco Relapse and Initiation Following a Period of Forced Abstinence in the U.S. Military: A Social Ecological ApproachR01DA043468 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA · PI LITTLE, MELISSA ASHLEY · 2018 to 2023
$3.2M
Evaluation of a brief tobacco intervention in the US militaryR21DA042083 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA · PI LITTLE, MELISSA ASHLEY, TALCOTT, GERALD WAYNE · 2016 to 2017
$386k
NCI NIH HHS L30 CA199230NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA037273NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA043468NIDA NIH HHS R21 DA042083
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Electronic Nicotine Delivery SystemsMilitary PersonnelVapingVeteransHumanselectronic nicotine delivery devicespublic policytobacco industry

Identifiers

PMID32398271
PMCPMC8101685

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.