Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32398090›Full record

ArticleHarm reduction journal2020

What is needed for implementing drug checking services in the context of the overdose crisis? A qualitative study to explore perspectives of potential service users.

Bruce Wallace, Thea van Roode, Flora Pagan, Paige Phillips, Hailly Wagner, Shane Calder, Jarred Aasen, Bernie Pauly, Dennis Hore

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Harm reduction journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06855836 (Efficacy and Implementation Considerations for a Peer-led Motivational Interviewing Intervention to Promote Uptake of Drug Checking Services and Safe Drug Use Behaviors to Reduce Overdose), which is not on this map. Cited by 44 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed
7.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06855836 naactive not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Efficacy and Implementation Considerations for a Peer-led Motivational Interviewing Intervention to Promote Uptake of Drug Checking Services and Safe Drug Use Behaviors to Reduce Overdose

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of California, San DiegoRan2025 to 2029Enrolled588ConditionsOverdoseArmsMI-CHANCE (TS + FTIR + MI), TS + FTIR + Flu and Hepatitis A Education
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 100 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. A survey of North American drug checking services operating in 2022.The International journal on drug policy · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Nordisk alkohol- & narkotikatidskrift : NAT · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Bruce WallaceCanadian Institute for Substance Use Research, University of Victoria, PO Box 1700, STN CSC, Victoria, BC, Canada. barclay@uvic.ca.ORCID 0000-0003-0360-7302
Thea van RoodeCanadian Institute for Substance Use Research, University of Victoria, PO Box 1700, STN CSC, Victoria, BC, Canada.
Flora PaganCanadian Institute for Substance Use Research, University of Victoria, PO Box 1700, STN CSC, Victoria, BC, Canada.
Paige PhillipsSOLID Outreach Society, 1056 North Park St, Victoria, BC, Canada.
Hailly WagnerSOLID Outreach Society, 1056 North Park St, Victoria, BC, Canada.
Shane CalderAVI Health & Community Services, 3rd Floor - Access Health Centre 713 Johnson St, Victoria, BC, Canada.
Jarred AasenLantern Services, 820 Cormorant St, Victoria, BC, Canada.
Bernie PaulyCanadian Institute for Substance Use Research, University of Victoria, PO Box 1700, STN CSC, Victoria, BC, Canada.
Dennis HoreDepartment of Chemistry, University of Victoria, PO Box 1700, STN CSC, Victoria, BC, Canada.
University of Victoria · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe current illicit drug overdose crisis within North America and other countries requires expanded and new responses to address unpredictable and potentially lethal substances, including fentanyl analogues, in the unregulated drug market. Community-wide drug checking is being increasingly explored as one such public health response. We explored how drug checking could be implemented as a potential harm reduction response to the overdose crisis, from the perspective of potential service users.

methodsThe research was guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). We conducted a qualitative, pre-implementation study to inform development and implementation of drug checking services that are acceptable to people who use substances and meet their needs. University and community researchers conducted 27 in-depth interviews with potential service users at prospective drug checking sites. We inductively developed emerging themes to inform the implementation of drug checking services within the five domains of the CFIR, and identified the most relevant constructs.

resultsImplementing community drug checking faces significant challenges within the current context of criminalization and stigmatization of substance use and people who use/sell drugs, and trauma experienced by potential service users. Participants identified significant risks in accessing drug checking, and that confidential and anonymous services are critical to address these. Engaging people with lived experience in the service can help establish trust. The relative advantage of drug checking needs to outweigh risks through provision of accurate results conveyed in a respectful, non-judgemental way. Drug checking should provide knowledge relevant to using and/or selling drugs and informing one's own harm reduction.

conclusionsFor service users, the extent to which the implementation of drug checking can respond to and mitigate the risks of being criminalized and stigmatized is critical to the acceptability and success of community drug checking. The culture and compatibility of the service, setting and staff with harm reduction principles and practices is essential.

Indexed as

Harm ReductionNeeds AssessmentAdultDrug ContaminationDrug OverdoseFemaleHumansIllicit DrugsInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchVictoriaYoung AdultIllicit DrugsConsolidated Framework for Implementation ResearchDrug checkingFentanylHarm reductionImplementation scienceOverdoseSpectroscopySubstance use

Identifiers

PMID32398090
PMCPMC7216532
OpenAlexW3028587945

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.