Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32398052›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2020

Improving dietary intake during lunch through the provision of a healthy school lunch at Dutch primary schools: design of a pretest-posttest effectiveness study.

Ellen van Kleef, Frédérique C Rongen, Monique H Vingerhoeds, S Coosje Dijkstra, Jaap C Seidell

Registry-linked trialAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06058325 (Healthy School Lunch at Primary Schools in Rotterdam, the Netherlands), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06058325 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Healthy School Lunch at Primary Schools in Rotterdam, the Netherlands

TypeinterventionalSponsorErasmus Medical CenterRan2023 to 2024Enrolled1,100ConditionsHealthyArmsHealthy school lunch
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ellen van KleefWageningen University & Research, Marketing and Consumer Behaviour group, Hollandseweg 1, 6706, KN, Wageningen, the Netherlands. Ellen.vanKleef@wur.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8797-6983
Frédérique C RongenVrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Faculty of Science, Amsterdam Public Health research institute, De Boelelaan 1085, 1081, HV, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Monique H VingerhoedsFood, Health & Consumer Research, Wageningen Food & Biobased Research, P.O. Box 17, 6700, AA, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
S Coosje DijkstraVrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Faculty of Science, Amsterdam Public Health research institute, De Boelelaan 1085, 1081, HV, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Jaap C SeidellVrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Faculty of Science, Amsterdam Public Health research institute, De Boelelaan 1085, 1081, HV, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Funding

Various funders, see statement in paper n.a.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSince there is a shift from eating lunch at home to eating lunch at primary schools in the Netherlands, providing a school lunch may be an important opportunity to improve the diet quality of Dutch children. Therefore, the aim of this Healthy School Lunch project is to encourage healthy eating behavior of children at primary schools by offering a healthy school lunch, based on the guidelines for a healthy diet. In this study, two research questions will be addressed. The first research question is: What and how much do children consume from a self-served school lunch and how do they evaluate the lunch? The second research question is: Do children compensate healthier school lunches by eating less healthy outside school hours? The purpose of this paper is to report the rationale and study design of this study.

methodsIn the Healthy School Lunch project children in grades 5-8 (aged 8-12 years) of three primary schools in the Netherlands will receive a healthy school lunch for a 6-month period. To answer research question 1, lunch consumption data will be collected at baseline and again at 3- and 6-months. This will be measured with lunch photos and questionnaires among children. To answer the second research question, a quasi-experimental, pre-test post-test intervention-comparison group design (3 intervention schools and 3 comparison schools) will be carried out. Potential compensation effects will be measured with a single brief questionnaire among parents at the three intervention and three comparison schools at month 6 of the lunch period. The school lunch will also be evaluated by parents (discussion groups) and teachers and support staff (brief questionnaires). DISCUSSION: Results of this study will provide valuable information to influence future school lunch interventions and policies.

trial registrationThis study is registered at the Netherlands trial register (NTR): trialregister.nl, Trial NL7402 (NTR7618), registered retrospectively at 2018-11-13.

Indexed as

LunchChildDiet, HealthyFemaleFood ServicesHumansMaleNetherlandsRetrospective StudiesSchoolsSurveys and QuestionnairesPrimary schoolSchool-based interventionSchool lunchVegetables

Identifiers

PMID32398052
PMCPMC7216421

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.