Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32398038›Full record

ArticleBMC biotechnology2020

Generation of transgene-free PDS mutants in potato by Agrobacterium-mediated transformation.

Zsófia Bánfalvi, Edina Csákvári, Vanda Villányi, Mihály Kondrák

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC biotechnology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 78 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. CRISPR/Cas9-MediatedPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  10. Substantial enhancement ofHorticulture research · 2025
    Article
  11. CRISPR/Cas system-mediated transgene-free or DNA-free genome editing in plants.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2025
    Review
  12. Article
  13. CRISPR-Cas applications in agriculture and plant research.Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology · 2025
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Genome-Editing ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Zsófia BánfalviNARIC Agricultural Biotechnology Institute, H-2100 Szent-Györgyi A. u. 4., Gödöllő, Hungary. banfalvi.zsofia@abc.naik.hu.ORCID 0000-0003-4729-4432
Edina CsákváriNARIC Agricultural Biotechnology Institute, H-2100 Szent-Györgyi A. u. 4., Gödöllő, Hungary.
Vanda VillányiNARIC Agricultural Biotechnology Institute, H-2100 Szent-Györgyi A. u. 4., Gödöllő, Hungary.
Mihály KondrákNARIC Agricultural Biotechnology Institute, H-2100 Szent-Györgyi A. u. 4., Gödöllő, Hungary.
Agricultural Biotechnology Institute · HU

Funding

NKFI K-120641
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGene editing using the CRISPR/Cas9 system has become a routinely applied method in several plant species. The most convenient gene delivery system is Agrobacterium-mediated gene transfer with antibiotic selection and stable genomic integration of transgenes, including Cas9. For elimination of transgenes in the segregating progeny, selfing is applied in many plant species. This approach, however, cannot be widely employed in potato because most of the commercial potato cultivars are self-incompatible.

resultsIn this study, the efficiency of a transient Cas9 expression system with positive/negative selection based on codA-nptII fusion was tested. The PHYTOENE DESATURASE (PDS) gene involved in carotenoid biosynthesis was targeted. A new vector designated PROGED::gPDS carrying only the right border of T-DNA was constructed. Using only the positive selection function of PROGED::gPDS and the restriction enzyme site loss method in PCR of genomic DNA after digestion with the appropriate restriction enzyme, it was demonstrated that the new vector is as efficient in gene editing as a traditional binary vector with right- and left-border sequences. Nevertheless, 2 weeks of positive selection followed by negative selection did not result in the isolation of PDS mutants. In contrast, we found that with 3-day positive selection, PDS mutants appear in the regenerating population with a minimum frequency of 2-10%. Interestingly, while large deletions (> 100 bp) were generated by continuous positive selection, the 3-day selection resulted in deletions and substitutions of only a few bp. Two albinos and three chimaeras with white and green leaf areas were found among the PDS mutants, while all the other PDS mutant plants were green. Based on DNA sequence analysis some of the green plants were also chimaeras. Upon vegetative propagation from stem segments in vitro, the phenotype of the plants obtained even by positive selection did not change, suggesting that the expression of Cas9 and gPDS is silenced or that the DNA repair system is highly active during the vegetative growth phase in potato.

conclusionsGene-edited plants can be obtained from potatoes by Agrobacterium-mediated transformation with 3-day antibiotic selection with a frequency high enough to identify the mutants in the regenerating plant population using PCR.

Indexed as

TransgenesAgrobacteriumBase SequenceClustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic RepeatsCRISPR-Cas SystemsDNA, BacterialGene EditingGenes, PlantGene Transfer TechniquesGenome, PlantMutationOxidoreductasesPhenotypePlant LeavesPlants, Genetically ModifiedSequence Analysis, DNADNA, BacterialOxidoreductasesphytoene dehydrogenaseT-DNAAgrobacteriumChimaeraCRISPR/Cas9Gene editingPotatoTransformationTransgene-free

Identifiers

PMID32398038
PMCPMC7216596
OpenAlexW3027701063

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.