Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32397994›Full record

ArticleBMC geriatrics2020

Are people in residential care entitled to receive rehabilitation services following hip fracture? Views of the public from a citizens' jury.

Maria Crotty, Emmanuel S Gnanamanickam, Ian Cameron, Meera Agar, Julie Ratcliffe, Kate Laver

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC geriatrics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Public Engagement in Health Policy-Making for Older Adults: A Systematic Search and Scoping Review.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Public perspectives on acquired brain injury rehabilitation and components of care: A Citizens' Jury.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Maria CrottyRehabilitation, Aged and Extended Care, College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, GPO Box 2100, Adelaide, South Australia, 5001, Australia. maria.crotty@flinders.edu.au.
Emmanuel S GnanamanickamNHMRC Cognitive Decline Partnership Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Ian CameronJohn Walsh Centre for Rehabilitation Research, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Meera AgarIMPACCT (Improving Palliative, Aged and Chronic Care through Clinical research and Translation) Centre, Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Ultimo, Australia.
Julie RatcliffeHealth Economics and Matthew Flinders Fellow, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia.
Kate LaverRehabilitation, Aged and Extended Care, College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, GPO Box 2100, Adelaide, South Australia, 5001, Australia.
Flinders University · AUUniversity of Sydney · AUSA Health · AUUniversity of Technology Sydney · AU

Funding

National Health and Medical Research Council (Australia) 9100000
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAccess to rehabilitation services for people living in residential care facilities is frequently limited. A randomised trial of a hospital outreach hip fracture rehabilitation program in residential care facilities has demonstrated improvements in mobility at four weeks and quality of life at 12 months but was not considered cost-effective by standard health economic metrics. The current study aimed to explore the general public's views on issues involved in the allocation of rehabilitation resources for residents of care facilities.

methodsA citizens' jury comprising 13 purposively sampled members of the general public, representative of the South Australian age, gender and household income profile. The jury considered the questions "Should there be an investment of physical rehabilitation services in residential care for older people following a hip fracture? If so, what is the best way of providing this service (considering funding, models of service delivery and equity)?" Deliberations were in the context of a state-wide health reform program. The jury was conducted over two days with an experienced independent facilitator, addressing questions developed by a steering group of research academics and clinicians.

resultsThe mean age of the citizens' jury members was 43 (range 26 to 61). Eleven members voted for investment in outreach hospital rehabilitation services in residential aged care. All jurors agreed a number of strategies in addition to investment should be implemented, including health care planning and decision making, increased emphasis on hip fracture prevention, training of aged care staff in rehabilitation and routine provision of hospital discharge summaries to families. The jury further advocated for an increased focus on rehabilitation in residential care, potentially through accreditation criteria, increasing health literacy of residents and families, implementation of age friendly environment strategies and improving connections of care facilities with community, hospital and tertiary services.

conclusionsThis citizens' jury representative of the general public recommends that regardless of dementia and frailty, people who live in residential care and are walking and fracture their hips should have access to hospital outreach rehabilitation and recovery services.

Indexed as

Health Care ReformQuality of LifeAgedAged, 80 and overAustraliaDecision MakingDelivery of Health CareHumansCitizens’ juryDementiaHip fractureNursing homesRehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID32397994
PMCPMC7216485
OpenAlexW3025340662

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.