ArticleBMC cancer2020
Association of DNA repair gene variants with colorectal cancer: risk, toxicity, and survival.
Article in BMC cancer, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Integrative Bioinformatics Analysis: Unraveling Variant Signatures and Single-Nucleotide Polymorphism Markers Associated with 5-FU-Based Chemotherapy Resistance in Colorectal Cancer Patients.Journal of gastrointestinal cancer · 2024Pooled it
- Epidemiological Evidence for Associations Between Genetic Variants and Osteosarcoma Susceptibility: A Meta-Analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Pooled it
- Ensemble learning-based predictor for driver synonymous mutation with sequence representation.PLoS computational biology · 2025Article
- Genetic variants and clinical determinants affecting the response to 5-Fluorouracil-based treatment in Chilean patients with advanced colorectal cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Role of Single-Nucleotide Polymorphisms in Genes Implicated in Capecitabine Pharmacodynamics on the Effectiveness of Adjuvant Therapy in Colorectal Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Article
- The role of heavy metals in the development of colorectal cancer.BMC cancer · 2023Article
- Contribution of Genetic Polymorphisms in Human Health.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Review
- Synonymous Variants: Necessary Nuance in Our Understanding of Cancer Drivers and Treatment Outcomes.Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2022Review
- Haplotypes of single cancer driver genes and their local ancestry in a highly admixed long-lived population of Northeast Brazil.Genetics and molecular biology · 2022Article
- The Road so Far in Colorectal Cancer Pharmacogenomics: Are We Closer to Individualised Treatment?Journal of personalized medicine · 2020Review
- Influence of Two DNA Repair Pathway Polymorphisms in Colorectal Cancer Risk in Southwest Iran.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSingle nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in DNA repair genes have a potential clinical value in predicting treatment outcomes. In the current study, we examined the association of SNPs in the genes XRCC1-rs25487, ERCC1-rs11615, ERCC2-rs238406, and ERCC2-rs13181 with colorectal cancer (CRC) risk, relapse-free survival (RFS), overall survival (OS), and toxicity during chemotherapy.
methodsSNPs were analysed in 590 CRC cases and 300 controls using TaqMan technology. The association of SNPs with CRC risk and toxicity during chemotherapy was analysed using Chi2 test. The Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test was used to measure the effects of the SNPs on RFS and OS.
resultsThe CC genotype of ERCC2-rs238406 and the ERCC2-rs13181 C allele were associated with a significantly increased risk of CRC. The ERCC1-rs11615 genotype T/T was associated with stomatitis in adjuvant chemotherapy (p = 0.03). Also, more patients with the ERCC2-rs13181 C allele needed dose reduction compared to patients with the A/A genotype (p = 0.02). In first line chemotherapy, more patients with the ERCC1-rs11615 C allele suffered from nausea compared to those with the T/T genotype (p = 0.04) and eye reactions and thrombocytopenia were more common in patients with the ERCC2-rs13181 C allele compared to the A/A genotype (p = 0.006 and p = 0.004, respectively). ERCC2- rs238406 C/C was also associated with a higher frequency of thrombocytopenia (p = 0.03). A shorter 5-year OS was detected in stage I & II CRC patients with the ERCC2- rs238406 C allele (p = 0.02). However, there was no significant association between the SNPs and 5-year RFS.
conclusionsBoth SNPs in ERCC2 were associated with risk of CRC as well as toxicity during first line treatment. In addition, ERCC2- rs238406 was linked to OS in early stage CRC. The ERCC1-rs11615 variant was associated with toxicity during adjuvant chemotherapy. The results add support to previous findings that SNPs in ERCC1 and ERCC2 have a prognostic and predictive value in clinical management of CRC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.