Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32397959›Full record

ArticleBMC neuroscience2020

Cathodal tDCS exerts neuroprotective effect in rat brain after acute ischemic stroke.

Ke-Ying Zhang, Gang Rui, Jun-Ping Zhang, Ling Guo, Guang-Zhou An, Jia-Jin Lin, Wei He, Gui-Rong Ding

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC neuroscience, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Multisession Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Enhances Adult Hippocampal Neurogenesis and Context Discrimination in Mice.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Ke-Ying ZhangDepartment of Radiation Biology, Faculty of Preventive Medicine, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, 710032, China.
Gang RuiDepartment of Radiation Biology, Faculty of Preventive Medicine, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, 710032, China.
Jun-Ping ZhangDepartment of Radiation Biology, Faculty of Preventive Medicine, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, 710032, China.
Ling GuoDepartment of Radiation Biology, Faculty of Preventive Medicine, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, 710032, China.
Guang-Zhou AnDepartment of Radiation Biology, Faculty of Preventive Medicine, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, 710032, China.
Jia-Jin LinDepartment of Radiation Biology, Faculty of Preventive Medicine, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, 710032, China.
Wei HeDepartment of Radiation Biology, Faculty of Preventive Medicine, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, 710032, China.
Gui-Rong DingDepartment of Radiation Biology, Faculty of Preventive Medicine, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, 710032, China. dingzhao@fmmu.edu.cn.ORCID 0000-0001-5750-6000
Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China · CN

Funding

Fourth Military Medical University 2016TSA-004
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTranscranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a non-invasive brain modulation technique that has been proved to exert beneficial effects in the acute phase of stroke. To explore the underlying mechanism, we investigated the neuroprotective effects of cathodal tDCS on brain injury caused by middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAO).

resultsWe established the MCAO model and sham MCAO model with an epicranial electrode implanted adult male Sprague-Dawley rats, and then they were randomly divided into four groups (MCAO + tDCS, MCAO + sham tDCS (Sham), Control + tDCS and Control + Sham group). In this study, the severity degree of neurological deficit, the morphology of brain damage, the apoptosis, the level of neuron-specific enolase and inflammatory factors, the activation of glial cells was detected. The results showed that cathodal tDCS significantly improved the level of neurological deficit and the brain morphology, reduced the brain damage area and apoptotic index, and increased the number of Nissl body in MCAO rats, compared with MCAO + Sham group. Meanwhile, the high level of NSE, inflammatory factors, Caspase 3 and Bax/Bcl2 ratio in MCAO rats was reduced by cathodal tDCS. Additionally, cathodal tDCS inhibited the activation of astrocyte and microglia induced by MCAO. No difference was found in two Control groups.

conclusionOur results suggested that cathodal tDCS could accelerate the recovery of neurologic deficit and brain damage caused by MCAO. The inhibition of neuroinflammation and apoptosis resulted from cathodal tDCS may be involved in the neuroprotective process.

Indexed as

Transcranial Direct Current StimulationAnimalsBrainBrain IschemiaMaleMicrogliaNeuroprotective AgentsRats, Sprague-DawleyStrokeNeuroprotective AgentsNeuroinflammationNeuroprotectionRatStroketDCS

Identifiers

PMID32397959
PMCPMC7216334
OpenAlexW3025982218

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.