Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32397451›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2020

In/Visible Physical Education and the Public Health Agenda of Physical Literacy Development in Hong Kong.

Kim-Wai Raymond Sum, Ming-Hui Li, Siu-Ming Choi, Yan Huang, Rui-Si Ma

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Measurements of Older Adults' Physical Competence under the Concept of Physical Literacy: A Scoping Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kim-Wai Raymond SumDepartment of Sports Science and Physical Education, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.ORCID 0000-0002-4051-9945
Ming-Hui LiDepartment of Sports Science and Physical Education, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.ORCID 0000-0003-4116-3685
Siu-Ming ChoiDepartment of Sports Science and Physical Education, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.ORCID 0000-0002-0716-699X
Yan HuangDepartment of Sports Science and Physical Education, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Rui-Si MaDepartment of Sports Science and Physical Education, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.ORCID 0000-0002-0460-7243

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this article, we will explore the recent development of physical literacy in the Hong Kong context and how the concept and operation of physical literacy implicitly exist at different levels of the Hong Kong education system. The Physical Education profession will be introduced. The development of physical literacy in terms of research and operationalization in primary, secondary, and tertiary education will then be discussed. We will go on to explore the challenges of extending the impact of physical literacy to the field of public health in Hong Kong. The article will end with a closing remark adopting the Chinese philosophies of Confucianism and Taoism to justify the belief that physical literacy is both implicitly and invisibly rooted in the Hong Kong Chinese culture.

Indexed as

Health LiteracyPhysical Education and TrainingPublic HealthHong KongHumansSurveys and QuestionnairesHong Kongphysical educationphysical literacypublic health

Identifiers

PMID32397451
PMCPMC7246486

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.