Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32397427›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2020

The Health and Welfare of Pigs from the Perspective of Post Mortem Findings in Slaughterhouses.

Vladimir Vecerek, Eva Voslarova, Zbynek Semerad, Annamaria Passantino

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Road Transport: A Review of Its Effects on the Welfare of Piglets.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Review
  8. Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Welfare of pigs on farm.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2022
    Article
  13. Animal Welfare and the Acknowledgment of Cultural Differences.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Vladimir VecerekDepartment of Animal Protection and Welfare and Veterinary Public Health, Faculty of Veterinary Hygiene and Ecology, University of Veterinary and Pharmaceutical Sciences Brno, 612 42 Brno, Czech Republic.
Eva VoslarovaCentral Veterinary Administration of the State Veterinary Administration, 120 00 Prague, Czech Republic.
Zbynek SemeradCentral Veterinary Administration of the State Veterinary Administration, 120 00 Prague, Czech Republic.
Annamaria PassantinoDepartment of Veterinary Sciences, University of Messina, Polo Universitario Annunziata, 981 68 Messina, Italy.

Funding

Veterinary Scientific Committee of the Czech Republic 2018
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The health and welfare of pigs was evaluated on the basis of the data on patho-anatomic findings obtained during the veterinary examination of pigs slaughtered in slaughterhouses in the Czech Republic in the period from 2010 to 2017. High numbers of lesions in organs found especially in lungs (finisher pigs 41%, sows 24% and piglets 52%), kidneys (finisher pigs 14%, sows 32% and piglets 15%) and liver (finisher pigs 12%, sows 18% and piglets 19 %) indicate impaired health and welfare of pigs transported for slaughter. The differences in the number of findings between finisher pigs, sows and piglets were statistically significant (

Indexed as

cull sowfinisher pighealthpigletpost mortem examinationslaughter

Identifiers

PMID32397427
PMCPMC7278684

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.