Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32397340›Full record

ReviewMicromachines2020

A Review of MEMS Capacitive Microphones.

Siti Aisyah Zawawi, Azrul Azlan Hamzah, Burhanuddin Yeop Majlis, Faisal Mohd-Yasin

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Micromachines, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Research on Flexible Sensors for Wearable Devices: A Review.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Emerging Wearable Acoustic Sensing Technologies.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Siti Aisyah ZawawiInstitute of Microengineering and Nanoelectronics, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi, Selangor 43600, Malaysia.
Azrul Azlan HamzahInstitute of Microengineering and Nanoelectronics, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi, Selangor 43600, Malaysia.
Burhanuddin Yeop MajlisInstitute of Microengineering and Nanoelectronics, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi, Selangor 43600, Malaysia.
Faisal Mohd-YasinQueensland Micro- and Nanotechnology Centre, Griffith University, Brisbane, QLD 4111, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This review collates around 100 papers that developed micro-electro-mechanical system (MEMS) capacitive microphones. As far as we know, this is the first comprehensive archive from academia on this versatile device from 1989 to 2019. These works are tabulated in term of intended application, fabrication method, material, dimension, and performances. This is followed by discussions on diaphragm, backplate and chamber, and performance parameters. This review is beneficial for those who are interested with the evolutions of this acoustic sensor.

Indexed as

acoustic sensorcapacitive microphonecondenser microphoneevolutionmicro-electro-mechanical system (MEMS)

Identifiers

PMID32397340
PMCPMC7281444

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.