Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32397296›Full record

ArticleNutrients2020

Assessing the Healthy Food Partnership's Proposed Nutrient Reformulation Targets for Foods and Beverages in Australia.

Emalie Rosewarne, Liping Huang, Clare Farrand, Daisy Coyle, Simone Pettigrew, Alexandra Jones, Michael Moore, Jacqui Webster

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nutrients, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Estimating the potential impact of the Australian government's reformulation targets on household sugar purchases.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Emalie RosewarneThe George Institute for Global Health, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5748-3953
Liping HuangThe George Institute for Global Health, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.
Clare FarrandThe George Institute for Global Health, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7660-1414
Daisy CoyleThe George Institute for Global Health, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8904-0671
Simone PettigrewThe George Institute for Global Health, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.
Alexandra JonesThe George Institute for Global Health, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5039-144X
Michael MooreThe George Institute for Global Health, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.
Jacqui WebsterThe George Institute for Global Health, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.
UNSW Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Non-communicable diseases (NCDs) are the leading cause of mortality and morbidity worldwide. Unhealthy diets are one of four main behavioral risk factors contributing to the majority of NCDs. To promote healthy eating and reduce dietary risks, the Australian Commonwealth Government established the Healthy Food Partnership (HFP). In 2018, the HFP consulted on proposed nutrient reformulation targets for 36 food categories to improve the overall quality of the food supply. This study assessed whether the proposed targets were feasible and appropriate. The HFP used a five-step approach to inform the proposed targets. We replicated and extended this approach using a different nutrient composition database (FoodSwitch). Products in FoodSwitch were mapped to the proposed HFP targets. The proportion of products meeting each target was calculated and the FoodSwitch data were compared with HFP data to determine whether the proposed target nutrient levels were appropriate or whether a more stringent target was feasible. Products from the FoodSwitch database (10,599) were mapped against the proposed HFP categories: 8434 products across 30 categories for sodium, 2875 products across seven categories for sugar, and 612 products across five categories for saturated fat. The analyses revealed that 14 of 30 proposed HFP targets for sodium, one of seven targets for sugar, and one of five targets for saturated fat were feasible and appropriate. For the remaining 26 reformulation targets, the results indicate that these target levels could be more stringent and alternative targets are proposed. The draft HFP targets are feasible but the majority are too conservative. If Australia is to meet its commitment to a 30 per cent reduction in the average population salt intake by 2025, these targets could be implemented as interim targets to be reached within two years. However, the opportunity exists to improve the food supply and strengthen the HFP's population health impact by adopting more ambitious and incremental targets. Reformulation programs should be prioritized and closely monitored as part of a coordinated, multi-faceted national food and nutrition strategy.

Indexed as

BeveragesDiet, HealthyFoodFood AnalysisFood QualityFood SupplyHealth PromotionNutritive ValuePopulation HealthAustraliaDatabases, FactualEatingHumansNutrientsSodium Chloride, DietaryNutrientsSodium Chloride, DietaryAustraliafood supplyreformulation

Identifiers

PMID32397296
PMCPMC7285116
OpenAlexW3020894266

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.