ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2020
How Reliable Is the Electrochemical Readout of MIP Sensors?
Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed, 84 citations in OpenAlex.
- Analytical applications of molecularly imprinted polymers: a personal view.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2026Review
- Toward Precision in Biomarker Analysis: A Novel Malondialdehyde Detection Method Based on Molecularly Imprinted Polymers.ACS omega · 2026Article
- Molecularly Imprinted Polymer (MIP)-Based Electrochemical Sensors for Pharmaceutical Detection in Wastewater: Imprinting Strategies, Analytical Performance, and Challenges.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Development of a Molecularly Imprinted Pencil Graphite Electrode for the Voltammetric Detection of HgACS omega · 2026Article
- Article
- Article
- Effect of Various Carbon Electrodes on MIP-Based Sensing Proteins Using Poly(Scopoletin): A Case Study of Ferritin.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Imprinted Polymers on the Route to Plastibodies for Biomacromolecules (MIPs), Viruses (VIPs), and Cells (CIPs).Advances in biochemical engineering/biotechnology · 2024Review
- Towards Electrochemical Sensor Based on Molecularly Imprinted Polypyrrole for the Detection of Bacteria-Polymers · 2023Article
- Electrochemical and Bioelectrochemical Sensing Platforms for Diagnostics of COVID-19.Biosensors · 2023Review
- Molecularly Imprinted Polymers for the Determination of Cancer Biomarkers.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Cationic Covalent Organic Polymer Thin Film for Label-free Electrochemical Bacterial Cell Detection.ACS sensors · 2022Article
- Electrochemical sensing of macromolecules based on molecularly imprinted polymers: challenges, successful strategies, and opportunities.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2022Review
- Molecularly Imprinted Polymer-Based Sensors for SARS-CoV-2: Where Are We Now?Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Electrochemically Deposited Molecularly Imprinted Polymer-Based Sensors.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Artificial Biomimetic Electrochemical Assemblies.Biosensors · 2022Review
- Article
- Reagentless Sensing of Vancomycin Using an Indium Tin Oxide Electrode Grafted with Molecularly Imprinted Polymer including Ferrocenyl Group.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Molecular Imprinting Technology for Determination of Uric Acid.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Electrochemical methods offer the simple characterization of the synthesis of molecularly imprinted polymers (MIPs) and the readouts of target binding. The binding of electroinactive analytes can be detected indirectly by their modulating effect on the diffusional permeability of a redox marker through thin MIP films. However, this process generates an overall signal, which may include nonspecific interactions with the nonimprinted surface and adsorption at the electrode surface in addition to (specific) binding to the cavities. Redox-active low-molecular-weight targets and metalloproteins enable a more specific direct quantification of their binding to MIPs by measuring the faradaic current. The in situ characterization of enzymes, MIP-based mimics of redox enzymes or enzyme-labeled targets, is based on the indication of an electroactive product. This approach allows the determination of both the activity of the bio(mimetic) catalyst and of the substrate concentration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.