Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32397088›Full record

ReviewPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland)2020

Antibody Targeting of Eph Receptors in Cancer.

Peter W Janes, Mary E Vail, Hui K Gan, Andrew M Scott

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Eph Receptors in Cancer.Biomedicines · 2023
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Peter W JanesOlivia Newton-John Cancer Institute and La Trobe University School of Cancer Medicine, Victoria 3084, Australia.
Mary E VailOlivia Newton-John Cancer Institute and La Trobe University School of Cancer Medicine, Victoria 3084, Australia.
Hui K GanOlivia Newton-John Cancer Institute and La Trobe University School of Cancer Medicine, Victoria 3084, Australia.
Andrew M ScottOlivia Newton-John Cancer Institute and La Trobe University School of Cancer Medicine, Victoria 3084, Australia.
La Trobe University · AUOlivia Newton-John Cancer Wellness & Research Centre · AU

Funding

Cancer Council Victoria Lyall WattsCure Brain Cancer Foundation Clinical trial grantNational Health and Medical Research Council 1092788National Health and Medical Research Council 1177837National Health and Medical Research Council 1183532
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Eph subfamily of receptor tyrosine kinases mediate cell-cell communication controlling cell and tissue patterning during development. While generally less active in adult tissues, they often re-emerge in cancers, particularly on undifferentiated or progenitor cells in tumors and the tumor microenvironment, associated with tumor initiation, angiogenesis and metastasis. Eph receptors are thus attractive therapeutic targets, and monoclonal antibodies have been commonly developed and tested for anti-cancer activity in preclinical models, and in some cases in the clinic. This review summarizes 20 years of research on various antibody-based approaches to target Eph receptors in tumors and the tumor microenvironment, including their mode of action, tumor specificity, and efficacy in pre-clinical and clinical testing.

Indexed as

cancerEph receptortherapeutic antibodies

Identifiers

PMID32397088
PMCPMC7281212
OpenAlexW3021961078

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.