Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32397082›Full record

ReviewBiomolecules2020

Challenges and Advances in Genome Editing Technologies in

Yawei Zhao, Guoquan Li, Yunliang Chen, Yinhua Lu

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biomolecules, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. STAGE: A compact and versatile TnpB-based genome editing toolkit forProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Application of multiple genomic-editing technologies inSynthetic and systems biotechnology · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Genomic Insights and Synthetic Biology Applications of Marine ActinomyceteInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genome editing in vancomycin-producing strainFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yawei ZhaoCollege of Life Sciences, Shanghai Normal University, Shanghai 200234, China.
Guoquan LiSchool of Food and Biological Engineering, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, China.
Yunliang ChenSchool of Agricultural Equipment Engineering, Zhenjiang, Jiangsu University Zhenjiang 212013, China.
Yinhua LuCollege of Life Sciences, Shanghai Normal University, Shanghai 200234, China.
Jiangsu University · CNShanghai Normal University · CN

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 31970083 and 31400083the Key R&D Plan of Dantu District NY2017001the Key R&D Plan of Zhenjiang City NY2018015the National Key R&D Program 2019YFA0905400the National Mega-project for Innovative Drugs 2018ZX09711001-006-012
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The genome of

Indexed as

CRISPR-Cas SystemsGene EditingIntegrasesRecombination, GeneticStreptomycesCre recombinaseIntegrasesCRISPR/Casgenome editingmicrobial natural productsStreptomyces

Identifiers

PMID32397082
PMCPMC7278167
OpenAlexW3021164454

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.