Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32397081›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2020

Acute Effects of Aerobic Exercise on Cognitive Attention and Memory Performance: An Investigation on Duration-Based Dose-Response Relations and the Impact of Increased Arousal Levels.

Sebastian Hacker, Winfried Banzer, Lutz Vogt, Tobias Engeroff

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Can 16 Minutes of HIIT Improve Attentional Resources in Young Students?Journal of functional morphology and kinesiology · 2023
    Article
  11. Effects of acute aerobic exercise on mnemonic discrimination performance in older adults.Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society : JINS · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sebastian HackerDepartment of Sports Medicine, Institute of Psychology and Sports Sciences, Goethe University, 60487 Frankfurt, Germany.
Winfried BanzerDepartment of Preventive and Sports Medicine, Institute of Occupational, Social and Environmental Medicine, Goethe University, 60590 Frankfurt, Germany.
Lutz VogtDepartment of Sports Medicine, Institute of Psychology and Sports Sciences, Goethe University, 60487 Frankfurt, Germany.
Tobias EngeroffDepartment of Preventive and Sports Medicine, Institute of Occupational, Social and Environmental Medicine, Goethe University, 60590 Frankfurt, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Current evidence indicates that acute aerobic exercise might increase domain-specific cognitive performance. However, only a small number of studies deduced the impact on lower and higher cognitive functions systematically or analyzed dose-response relationships and the underlying mechanisms. This study aimed to expose the dose-response relationships by investigating the influence of exercise duration on subjective and objective arousal, cognitive attention and visual recognition memory tasks. Nineteen participants (eight female; 25.69 ± 3.11 years) were included in a randomized, three-armed intervention study in a cross-over design. The participants completed three different interventions consisting of either 15, 30 or 45 min of cycling at 60-70% VO

Indexed as

attentioncognitionexecutive functionmemoryreaction time

Identifiers

PMID32397081
PMCPMC7291087

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.