Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32396986›Full record

GuidelineAnaesthesia2020

Multidisciplinary guidance for safe tracheostomy care during the COVID-19 pandemic: the NHS National Patient Safety Improvement Programme (NatPatSIP).

B A McGrath, N Ashby, M Birchall, P Dean, C Doherty, K Ferguson, J Gimblett, M Grocott, T Jacob, C Kerawala and 6 more

Abstract readPractice Guideline
In one paragraph

Guideline in Anaesthesia, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. A 30-day Survival and Safety of Percutaneous Tracheostomy in Moderate-to-severe COVID-19 Pneumonia Patients: A Single-center Experience.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Histological findings of tracheal samples from COVID-19 positive critically ill mechanically ventilated patients.Clinical otolaryngology : official journal of ENT-UK ; official journal of Netherlands Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology & Cervico-Facial Surgery · 2022
    Article
  18. Viral Infectivity in Patients Undergoing Tracheotomy With COVID-19: A Preliminary Study.Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery · 2021
    Observational
  19. Surgical tracheotomy in COVID-19 patients: an Italian single centre experience.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2021
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

B A McGrathDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Wythenshawe Hospital, Manchester University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, National Tracheostomy Safety Project, Manchester, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3048-3480
N AshbyRoyal College of Nursing, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
M BirchallBritish Laryngological Association, University College London, London, UK.
P DeanIntensive Care Society, Royal Blackburn Teaching Hospital, Lancashire, UK.
C DohertyRoyal Manchester Children's Hospital, National Tracheostomy Safety Project Paediatric Lead, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
K FergusonAberdeen Royal Infirmary, Association of Anaesthetists, Aberdeen, UK.
J Gimblett
M GrocottAnaesthesia and Critical Care, Royal College of Anaesthetists, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
T JacobENT & Head and Neck surgeon, Lewisham & Greenwich NHS Trust, ENT-UKt, London, UK.
C KerawalaMaxillofacial & Head and Neck Surgeon, The Royal Marsden Hospital, British Association of Head & Neck Oncologists, London, UK.
P MacnaughtonIntensive Care Medicine at Derriford Hospital, Faculty of Intensive Care Medicine, Plymouth, UK.
P MagennisOral and Maxillofacial Surgeon, Aintree University Hospital, NHS Foundation Trust, British Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons, Liverpool, UK.
R MoonesingheAnaesthetics and Critical Care Medicine, NHS England & NHS Improvement, University College London Hospitals, London, UK.
P TwoseAssociation of Chartered Physiotherapists in Respiratory Care, Cardiff and Vale University Health Board, Cardiff, UK.
S WallaceSpeech & Language Therapist, Royal College of Speech & Language Therapists, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
A HiggsAnaesthesia & Intensive Care Medicine, Warrington & Halton Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Difficult Airway Society, Warrington, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic is causing a significant increase in the number of patients requiring relatively prolonged invasive mechanical ventilation and an associated surge in patients who need a tracheostomy to facilitate weaning from respiratory support. In parallel, there has been a global increase in guidance from professional bodies representing staff who care for patients with tracheostomies at different points in their acute hospital journey, rehabilitation and recovery. Of concern are the risks to healthcare staff of infection arising from tracheostomy insertion and caring for patients with a tracheostomy. Hospitals are also facing extraordinary demands on critical care services such that many patients who require a tracheostomy will be managed outside established intensive care or head and neck units and cared for by staff with little tracheostomy experience. These concerns led NHS England and NHS Improvement to expedite the National Patient Safety Improvement Programme's 'Safe Tracheostomy Care' workstream as part of the NHS COVID-19 response. Supporting this workstream, UK stakeholder organisations involved in tracheostomy care were invited to develop consensus guidance based on: expert opinion; the best available published literature; and existing multidisciplinary guidelines. Topics with direct relevance for frontline staff were identified. This consensus guidance includes: infectivity of patients with respect to tracheostomy indications and timing; aerosol-generating procedures and risks to staff; insertion procedures; and management following tracheostomy.

Indexed as

Patient SafetyTracheostomyConsensusCoronavirus InfectionsCOVID-19HumansInfectious Disease Transmission, Patient-to-ProfessionalPandemicsPersonal Protective EquipmentPneumonia, ViralRespiration, ArtificialSafetyState MedicinecoronavirusCOVID-19personal protective equipmenttracheostomy

Identifiers

PMID32396986
PMCPMC7272992

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.