Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32396917›Full record

Trial reportPsychotherapy and psychosomatics2020

Improving Cost-effectiveness and Access to Cognitive Behavior Therapy for Depression: Providing Remote-Ready, Computer-Assisted Psychotherapy in Times of Crisis and Beyond.

Michael E Thase, Paul McCrone, Marna S Barrett, Tracy D Eells, Stephen R Wisniewski, G K Balasubramani, Gregory K Brown, Jesse H Wright

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Psychotherapy and psychosomatics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Identifying person-level factors to guide digital mental health treatments for cancer survivors: an ecological momentary assessment study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Exercise for the Prevention and Treatment of Depression.Current topics in behavioral neurosciences · 2024
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Michael E ThasePerelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA, thase@pennmedicine.upenn.edu.
Paul McCroneKing's College, London, United Kingdom.
Marna S BarrettPerelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Tracy D EellsUnversity of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky, USA.
Stephen R WisniewskiGraduate School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
G K BalasubramaniGraduate School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Gregory K BrownPerelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Jesse H WrightUnversity of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky, USA.
University of Louisville · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · USUniversity of Pittsburgh · USKing's College London · GBPhiladelphia VA Medical Center · US

Funding

1/2-Efficacy of Computer-Assisted Cognitive Behavior Therapy for DepressionR01MH082794 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI THASE, MICHAEL E · 2010 to 2013
$1.9M
2/2-Computer-Assisted Cognitive-Behavior Therapy for DepressionR01MH082762 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE · PI WRIGHT, JESSE H. · 2010 to 2013
$1.1M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH082762NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH082794
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThere is growing evidence that computer-delivered or computer-assisted forms of cognitive behavior therapy (CCBT) are helpful, but cost-effectiveness versus standard therapies is not well established.

objectiveTo evaluate the cost-effectiveness of a therapist-supported method for CCBT in comparison to standard cognitive behavior therapy (CBT).

methodsA total of 154 drug-free major depressive disorder outpatients were randomly assigned to either 16 weeks of standard CBT (up to twenty 50-min sessions) or CCBT using the Good Days Ahead program (including up to 5.5 h of therapist contact). Outcomes were assessed at baseline, weeks 8 and 16, and at 3 and 6 months post-treatment. Economic analyses took into account the costs of services received and work/social role impairment.

resultsIn the context of almost identical efficacy, a form of CCBT that used only about one third the amount of therapist contact as conventional CBT was highly cost-effective compared to conventional therapy and reduced the adjusted cost of treatment by USD 945 per patient.

conclusionsA method of CCBT that blended internet-delivered modules and abbreviated therapeutic contact reduced the cost of treatment substantially without adversely affecting outcomes. Results suggest that use of this approach can more than double the access to CBT. Because clinician support in CCBT can be provided by telephone, videoconference, and/or email, this highly efficient form of treatment could be a major advance in remote treatment delivery.

Indexed as

Quality of LifeCognitive Behavioral TherapyCost-Benefit AnalysisFemaleHumansMajor Depressive DisorderMaleMiddle AgedPatient Acceptance of Health CareTherapy, Computer-AssistedComputer-assisted cognitive behavior therapyCost-effectivenessDepression

Identifiers

PMID32396917
PMCPMC7483890
OpenAlexW3025959868

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.