ArticleCancer cell2020
Microbial Diagnostics for Cancer: A Step Forward but Not Prime Time Yet.
Article in Cancer cell, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Whole-genome sequencing and analysis of a novel strainMicrobiome research reports · 2025Article
- Blood Microbiota and Its Products: Mechanisms of Interference with Host Cells and Clinical Outcomes.Hematology reports · 2024Review
- Microbes for lung cancer detection: feasibility and limitations.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Review
- Next-generation sequencing: insights to advance clinical investigations of the microbiome.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Translational microbiome science in humans has not yet fully realized its clinical potentials. The analyses by Poore et al. in Nature offer a strong foundation on which to begin to build microbial diagnostics to detect cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
32396856What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.