ArticleTrends in genetics : TIG2020
Repetitive Elements: Different Subtypes Hint at Distinct Functions.
Article in Trends in genetics : TIG, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Spartina alterniflora genome sequence provides insights into the salt-tolerance mechanisms of exo-recretohalophytes.Plant biotechnology journal · 2024Article
- Retrotransposons as a Source of DNA Damage in Neurodegeneration.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Lu et al. report that the association of different repeat types with distinct gene classes goes far beyond what has previously been shown and suggest that such relationship might be essential for gene function and regulation. As an example, they describe how long interspersed nuclear repeat (LINE1) transcripts are recruited together with associated genes to silent nuclear regions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
32396830What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.