ArticleJournal of the Royal Society, Interface2020
The interplay of phenotypic variability and fitness in finite microbial populations.
Article in Journal of the Royal Society, Interface, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Extremal events dictate population growth rate inference.PLoS computational biology · 2026Article
- Coupling Bacterial Cell Size Regulation with Clonal Proliferation Dynamics Reveals Cell Division Based on Surface Area.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Article
- Microfluidic dose-response platform to track the dynamics of drug response in single mycobacterial cells.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Analytical cell size distribution: lineage-population bias and parameter inference.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2022Article
- Collective behavior and nongenetic inheritance allow bacterial populations to adapt to changing environments.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022Article
- Modeling the impact of single-cell stochasticity and size control on the population growth rate in asymmetrically dividing cells.PLoS computational biology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In isogenic microbial populations, phenotypic variability is generated by a combination of stochastic mechanisms, such as gene expression, and deterministic factors, such as asymmetric segregation of cell volume. Here we address the question: how does phenotypic variability of a microbial population affect its fitness? While this question has previously been studied for exponentially growing populations, the situation when the population size is kept fixed has received much less attention, despite its relevance to many natural scenarios. We show that the outcome of competition between multiple microbial species can be determined from the distribution of phenotypes in the culture using a generalization of the well-known Euler-Lotka equation, which relates the steady-state distribution of phenotypes to the population growth rate. We derive a generalization of the Euler-Lotka equation for finite cultures, which relates the distribution of phenotypes among cells in the culture to the exponential growth rate. Our analysis reveals that in order to predict fitness from phenotypes, it is important to understand how distributions of phenotypes obtained from different subsets of the genealogical history of a population are related. To this end, we derive a mapping between the various ways of sampling phenotypes in a finite population and show how to obtain the equivalent distributions from an exponentially growing culture. Finally, we use this mapping to show that species with higher growth rates in exponential growth conditions will have a competitive advantage in the finite culture.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.