Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32396700›Full record

Trial reportJournal of the International AIDS Society2020

Integrating oral PrEP delivery among African women in a large HIV endpoint-driven clinical trial.

Ivana Beesham, Julia D Welch, Renee Heffron, Melanie Pleaner, Lara Kidoguchi, Thesla Palanee-Phillips, Khatija Ahmed, Deborah Baron, Elizabeth A Bukusi, Cheryl Louw and 9 more

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of the International AIDS Society, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. The demographic features and outcome indicators of the Barbados HIV Pre-exposure Prophylaxis Program, 2018-2019.Revista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Ivana BeeshamMatCH Research Unit (MRU), Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Durban, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0003-4889-8123
Julia D WelchFHI 360, Durham, NC, USA.
Renee HeffronUniversity of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6039-0352
Melanie PleanerWits Reproductive Health and HIV Institute, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Lara KidoguchiUniversity of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Thesla Palanee-PhillipsWits Reproductive Health and HIV Institute, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Khatija AhmedSetshaba Research Centre, Tshwane, South Africa.
Deborah BaronWits Reproductive Health and HIV Institute, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0001-5439-2538
Elizabeth A BukusiUniversity of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Cheryl LouwMadibeng Centre for Research, Brits, South Africa.
Timothy D MastroFHI 360, Durham, NC, USA.
Jennifer SmitMatCH Research Unit (MRU), Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Durban, South Africa.
Joanne R BattingEffective Care Research Unit (ECRU), Fort Hare and Eastern Cape Department of Health, Universities of the Witwatersrand, East London, South Africa.
Mookho MalahlehaSetshaba Research Centre, Tshwane, South Africa.
Veronique C BaileySetshaba Research Centre, Tshwane, South Africa.
Mags BeksinskaMatCH Research Unit (MRU), Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Durban, South Africa.
Deborah DonnellUniversity of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Jared M BaetenUniversity of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8242-8438
ECHO Trial Consortium
University of the Witwatersrand · ZAUniversity of Washington · USSetshaba Research Centre · ZAFamily Health International 360 · USUniversity of South Africa · ZAWestern Cape Department of Health · ZA

Funding

Wits HIV Research Group CLINICAL TRIAL UNIT (CTU) reapplicationUM1AI069463 · NIAID · WITS HEALTH CONSORTIUM (PTY), LTD · PI REES, HELEN, SANNE, IAN MATTHIAS · 2012 to 2025
$31.8M
NIAID NIH HHS UM1 AI069463PEPFAR
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionGlobal guidelines emphasize the ethical obligation of investigators to help participants in HIV-endpoint trials reduce HIV risk by offering an optimal HIV prevention package. Oral pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) has increasingly become part of state-of-the-art HIV prevention. Here we describe the process of integrating oral PrEP delivery into the HIV prevention package of the Evidence for Contraceptive Options and HIV Outcomes (ECHO) Trial.

methodsECHO was an open-label randomized clinical trial that compared HIV incidence among women randomized to one of three effective contraceptives. In total, 7830 women aged 16 to 35 years from 12 sites in four African countries (Eswatini, Kenya, South Africa and Zambia) were enrolled and followed for 12 to 18 months, from 2015 to 2018. Part-way through the course of the trial, oral PrEP was provided to study participants either off-site via referral or on site via trained trial staff. PrEP uptake was compared between different contraceptive users using Chi-squared tests or t-tests. HIV seroincidence rates were compared between participants who never versus ever initiated PrEP using exact Poisson regression.

resultsPrEP access in ECHO began through public availability in Kenya in May 2017 and was available at all sites by June 2018. When PrEP became available, 3626 (46.3%) eligible women were still in follow-up in the study, and of these, 622 (17.2%) initiated PrEP. Women initiating PrEP were slightly older; more likely to be unmarried, not living with their partner, having multiple partners; and less likely to be earning their own income and receiving financial support from partners (all p < 0.05). PrEP initiation did not differ across study randomized groups (p = 0.7). Two-thirds of PrEP users were continuing PrEP at study exit.

conclusionsThere is a need for improved HIV prevention services in clinical trials with HIV endpoints, especially trials among African women. PrEP as a component of a comprehensive HIV prevention package provided to women in a large clinical trial is practical and feasible. Provision of PrEP within clinical trials with HIV outcomes should be standard of prevention.

Indexed as

Pre-Exposure ProphylaxisAdministration, OralAdolescentAdultAnti-HIV AgentsEswatiniFemaleHIV InfectionsHumansIncidenceKenyaSexual PartnersSouth AfricaYoung AdultZambiaAnti-HIV Agentsclinical trialsHIVpre-exposure prophylaxisstandard of carewomen

Identifiers

PMID32396700
PMCPMC7217491
OpenAlexW3025816981

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.