Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32396619›Full record

ReviewBlood advances2020

Laboratory monitoring of hemophilia A treatments: new challenges.

Peter J Lenting

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Blood advances, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05856903 (Impact of Emicizumab on ACT), which is not on this map. Cited by 42 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05856903 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Impact of Emicizumab on ACT (Activated Clotting Time) Using the i-STAT Alinity Analyzer: In Vitro Study in Severe Hemophiliacs A and Healthy Volunteers

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity Hospital, GrenobleRan2023 to 2025Enrolled15ConditionsHemophilia AArmsACT
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 77 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Laboratory Challenges in the Era of Novel Haemophilia Therapies.Transfusion medicine and hemotherapy : offizielles Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Transfusionsmedizin und Immunhamatologie · 2026
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Factor VIIIResearch and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. The Mirage of Factor Equivalence: Examining the Complexities of Non-Factor Therapies in Haemophilia.Haemophilia : the official journal of the World Federation of Hemophilia · 2025
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Normalization in hemophilia: conceptual foundations and clinical implications.Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2025
    Review
  16. Estimating the Factor VIII-Equivalent Activity of Emicizumab Using Global Assays of Haemostasis.Haemophilia : the official journal of the World Federation of Hemophilia · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Guidelines for management of hemophilia-why, what, and how?Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Peter J LentingHémostase Inflammation Thrombose, INSERM, Unité Mixte de Recherche Scientifique 1176, Université Paris-Saclay, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France.
Inserm · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Monitoring factor VIII (FVIII) activity has traditionally been complicated by discrepancies between assays for the various sorts of FVIII molecules. The advent of novel nonfactor therapies (emicizumab, fitusiran, and anti-tissue factor pathway inhibitor antibodies) in hemophilia A poses a new level of difficulty on the laboratory monitoring of these patients. To use the correct assays and for a proper interpretation of their results, it is pertinent to understand the mode of action of these nonfactor agents. Furthermore, the biochemical consequences for the different types of activity assays (whether it be specific FVIII activity assays or global coagulation assays) should be taken into account as well. In this review, these aspects will be discussed. In addition, the use of various animal models to estimate FVIII-equivalence of the nonfactor therapies will be presented.

Indexed as

Hemophilia AHemostaticsAnimalsBlood CoagulationBlood Coagulation TestsHumansLaboratoriesHemostatics

Identifiers

PMID32396619
PMCPMC7218434
OpenAlexW3025362682

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.