Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32396569›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Development and validation of a questionnaire to assess healthcare personnel competence in cardiac arrest and resuscitation in pregnancy.

Ann-Chatrin L Leonardsen, Edel J Svendsen, Grethe B Heitmann, Adam Dhayyat, Ann Morris, Katrine D Sjøborg, Richard M Olsen, Camilla Hardeland

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in Obstetric Patient: Special Considerations.Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology of India · 2022
    Review
  5. [Cardiac arrest under special circumstances].Notfall & rettungsmedizin · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ann-Chatrin L LeonardsenDepartment of Health and Welfare, Ostfold University College, Halden, Norway.ORCID 0000-0001-5608-9401
Edel J SvendsenDepartment of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Grethe B HeitmannDepartment of Anesthesiology, Ostfold Hospital Trust, Grålum, Norway.
Adam DhayyatDepartment of Medicine, Ostfold Hospital Trust, Grålum, Norway.
Ann MorrisDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ostfold Hospital Trust, Grålum, Norway.
Katrine D SjøborgDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ostfold Hospital Trust, Grålum, Norway.
Richard M OlsenDepartment of Competence Development, Ostfold Hospital Trust, Grålum, Norway.ORCID 0000-0001-8178-3972
Camilla HardelandDepartment of Health and Welfare, Ostfold University College, Halden, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCardiac arrest is rare in pregnancy, and up-to date competence can be difficult to assess and maintain. The objective of this study was to develop and validate a questionnaire to assess healthcare personnel experiences, self-assessed competence and perception of role and resposibility related to cardiac arrest and cardio-pulmonary resuscitation (CPR) in pregnancy.

methodsThe study had a cross-sectional design, developing and validating a questionnaire: the Competence in cardiac arrest and CPR in pregnancy (ComCA-P). Development and validation of the ComCA-P was conducted in three stages: 1) Literature review and expert group panel inputs, 2) a pilot study and 3) a cross-sectional questionnaire study. In stage one, the ComCA-P was developed over several iterations between the researchers, including inputs from an expert group panel consisting of highly competent professionals (n = 11). In stage two, the questionnaire was piloted in a group of healthcare personnel with relevant competence (n = 16). The ComCA-P was then used in a baseline study including healthcare personnel potentially involved in CPR in pregnancy (n = 527) in six hospital wards. Based on these data, internal consistency, intra-class correlations, and confirmatory factor analysis were utilized to validate the questionnaire.

resultsThe expert group and pilot study participants evaluated the appropriateness, relevance and accuracy to be high. Formulation of the items was considered appropriate, with no difficulties identified related to content- or face validity. Cronbach's alpha was 0.8 on the thematic area self-assessment, and 0.73 on the theoretical knowledge area of the ComCA-P. On both the self-assessed competence items and the teoretical knowledge items, Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin was 0.8. Moreover, the Bertletts' test of sphericity was greater than the critical value for chi-square, and significant (p < .0001).

conclusionsFindings indicate that the ComCA-P is a valid questionnaire that can be used to assess healthcare personnel competence in cardiac arrest and resuscitation in pregnancy.

Indexed as

Clinical CompetenceCardiopulmonary ResuscitationCesarean SectionCross-Sectional StudiesExpert TestimonyFactor Analysis, StatisticalFeasibility StudiesFemaleHealth PersonnelHeart ArrestHumansPilot ProjectsPregnancyPregnancy Complications, CardiovascularReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID32396569
PMCPMC7217426

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.