Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32396219›Full record

ReviewEpilepsia2020

The postictal state - What do we know?

Julia C M Pottkämper, Jeannette Hofmeijer, Jeroen A van Waarde, Michel J A M van Putten

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Epilepsia, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 63 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
63citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

63 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Determinants of health-related quality of life of patients with focal epilepsy: A systematic literature review.Epileptic disorders : international epilepsy journal with videotape · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

3 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Julia C M PottkämperClinical Neurophysiology, Technical Medical Centre, Faculty of Science and Technology, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-8049-9865
Jeannette HofmeijerClinical Neurophysiology, Technical Medical Centre, Faculty of Science and Technology, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-7593-5674
Jeroen A van WaardeDepartment of Psychiatry, Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-6792-5727
Michel J A M van PuttenClinical Neurophysiology, Technical Medical Centre, Faculty of Science and Technology, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-8319-3626

Funding

Epilepsiefonds 309-16311
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This narrative review provides a broad and comprehensive overview of the most important discoveries on the postictal state over the past decades as well as recent developments. After a description and definition of the postictal state, we discuss postictal sypmtoms, their clinical manifestations, and related findings. Moreover, pathophysiological advances are reviewed, followed by current treatment options.

Indexed as

BrainConfusionElectroencephalographyHumansMental DisordersSeizuresepilepsypostictal suppressionpostictal symptomspostictal treatmentSUDEP

Identifiers

PMID32396219
PMCPMC7317965

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.