ArticleIEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control2020
Intrinsic Tradeoffs in Multi-Covariate Imaging of Sub-Resolution Targets.
Article in IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Separation of mainlobe and sidelobe contributions to B-mode ultrasound images based on the aperture spectrum.Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.) · 2022Article
- Adaptive Models for Multi-Covariate Imaging of Sub-Resolution Targets (MIST).IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control · 2022Article
- Advances in ultrasonography: image formation and quality assessment.Journal of medical ultrasonics (2001) · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Multi-covariate Imaging of Sub-resolution Targets (MIST) is an estimation-based method of imaging the statistics of diffuse scattering targets. MIST estimates the contributions of a set of covariance models to the echo data covariance matrix. Models are defined based on a spatial decomposition of the theoretical transmit intensity distribution into ON-axis and OFF-axis contributions, delineated by a user-specified spatial cutoff. We define this cutoff as the region of interest width (ROI width). In our previous work, we selected the ROI width as the first zero crossing separating the mainlobe from the sidelobe regions. This article explores the effects of varying two key parameters on MIST image quality: 1) ROI width and 2) the degree of spatial averaging of the measured echo data covariance matrix. These results demonstrate a fundamental tradeoff between resolution and speckle texture. We characterize MIST imaging performance across these tunable parameters in a number of simulated, phantom, and in vivo liver applications. We consider performance in noise, fidelity to native contrast, resolution, and speckle texture. MIST is also compared with varying levels of spatial and frequency compounding, demonstrating quantitative improvements in image quality at comparable levels of speckle reduction. In an in vivo example, optimized MIST images demonstrated 20.2% and 13.4% improvements in contrast-to-noise ratio over optimized spatial and frequency compounding images, respectively. These results present a framework for selecting MIST parameters to maximize speckle signal-to-noise ratio without an appreciable loss in resolution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.