Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32396066›Full record

ArticleeLife2020

IP

Jeffrey T Lock, Ian Parker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Agonist-Induced CaCells · 2024
    Article
  9. An integrate-and-fire approach to CaBiophysical journal · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Modeling IPBiophysical journal · 2023
    Article
  12. Review
  13. An integrate-and-fire approach to CaBiophysical journal · 2023
    Article
  14. Computational investigation of IPScientific reports · 2023
    Article
  15. Dissociation of inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate from IPThe Journal of biological chemistry · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Functional determination of calcium-binding sites required for the activation of inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptors.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  19. Segregated cation flux by TPC2 biases CaNature communications · 2022
    Article
  20. The role of CaPoultry science · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jeffrey T LockDepartment of Neurobiology & Behavior, UC Irvine, Irvine, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-1522-3189
Ian ParkerDepartment of Neurobiology & Behavior, UC Irvine, Irvine, United States.

Funding

Elementary Events of Intracellular Calcium SignalingR37GM048071 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI PARKER, IAN · 2011 to 2020
$5.3M
SPATIAL AND TEMPORAL ASPECTS OF INSP3 SIGNALLINGR01GM048071 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI PARKER, IAN · 1992 to 2010
$3.9M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM048071NIGMS NIH HHS R37 GM048071
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The 'building-block' model of inositol trisphosphate (IP

Indexed as

Calcium SignalingCalciumCytosolEndoplasmic ReticulumHEK293 CellsHeLa CellsHumansInositol 1,4,5-TrisphosphateInositol 1,4,5-Trisphosphate ReceptorsKineticsCalciumInositol 1,4,5-TrisphosphateInositol 1,4,5-Trisphosphate Receptorscalcium imagingcalcium signalingcell biologyhumanip3 receptormolecular biophysicsstructural biology

Identifiers

PMID32396066
PMCPMC7253181

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.