Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32395682›Full record

ArticleJCO precision oncology2020

Factors Associated with Declining to Participate in a Pediatric Oncology Next Generation Sequencing Study.

Katianne M Howard Sharp, Niki Jurbergs, Annastasia Ouma, Lynn Harrison, Elsie Gerhardt, Leslie Taylor, Kayla Hamilton, Rose B McGee, Regina Nuccio, Emily Quinn and 11 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JCO precision oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Beyond mistrust: Diverse biobanking preferences among parents and adolescents with sickle cell disease.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Informed consent for genetic testing in hematology.Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program · 2020
    Review
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Katianne M Howard SharpDepartment of Psychology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis TN, 38105.
Niki JurbergsDepartment of Psychology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis TN, 38105.
Annastasia OumaDivision of Cancer Predisposition, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis TN, 38105.
Lynn HarrisonDivision of Cancer Predisposition, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis TN, 38105.
Elsie GerhardtDivision of Cancer Predisposition, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis TN, 38105.
Leslie TaylorDivision of Cancer Predisposition, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis TN, 38105.
Kayla HamiltonDivision of Cancer Predisposition, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis TN, 38105.
Rose B McGeeDivision of Cancer Predisposition, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis TN, 38105.
Regina NuccioDivision of Cancer Predisposition, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis TN, 38105.
Emily QuinnDivision of Cancer Predisposition, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis TN, 38105.
Stacy Hines-DowellDivision of Cancer Predisposition, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis TN, 38105.
Chimene KesserwanDivision of Cancer Predisposition, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis TN, 38105.
Anusha SunkaraDepartment of Biostatistics, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis TN, 38105.
Jami S GattusoDivision of Nursing Research, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis TN, 38105.
Michelle PritchardDivision of Nursing Research, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis TN, 38105.
Belinda MandrellDivision of Nursing Research, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis TN, 38105.
Mary V RellingDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis TN, 38105.
Cyrine E HaidarDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis TN, 38105.
Guolian KangDepartment of Biostatistics, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis TN, 38105.
Liza M JohnsonDepartment of Oncology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis TN, 38105.
Kim E NicholsDivision of Cancer Predisposition, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis TN, 38105.
St. Jude Children's Research Hospital · US

Funding

CPML - Project 3: Genome-wide Studies of Adverse EffectsP50GM115279 · NIGMS · ST. JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL · PI LOH, MIGNON LEE-CHEUN, RELLING, MARY V · 2015 to 2019
$15.1M
NIGMS NIH HHS P50 GM115279
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeFor the advances of pediatric oncology next generation sequencing (NGS) research to equitably benefit all children, a diverse and representative sample of participants is needed. However, little is known about demographic and clinical characteristics that differentiate families who decline enrollment in pediatric oncology NGS research.

methodsDemographic and clinical data were retrospectively extracted for 363 pediatric oncology patients (0-21 years) approached for enrollment on Genomes for Kids (G4K), a study examining the feasibility of comprehensive clinical genomic analysis of tumors and paired normal samples. Demographic and clinical factors that significantly differentiated which families declined were subsequently compared to enrollment in Clinical Implementation of Pharmacogenetics (PG4KDS) for 348 families, a pharmacogenomics study with more explicit therapeutic benefit examining genes affecting drug responses and metabolism.

resultsFifty-three (14.6%) families declined enrollment in G4K. Race/ethnicity was the only variable that significantly differentiated study refusal using multivariate logistic regression, with families of black children more likely to decline enrollment compared to families of non-Hispanic or Hispanic white children. Reasons for declining G4K were generally consistent with other pediatric genomics research, with feeling overwhelmed and insurance discrimination fears most frequently cited. Families of black children were also more likely to decline enrollment in PG4KDS. Thirteen (3.7%) of the 348 families approached for both studies declined PG4KDS.

conclusionRace/ethnicity differentiated study declination across two different pediatric oncology genomics studies, suggesting enrollment disparities in the context of pediatric oncology genomics research. Genomics research participant samples that do not fully represent racial and ethnic minorities risk further exacerbating health disparities. Additional work is needed to understand the nuances of parental decision making in genomic research and facilitate enrollment of diverse patient populations.

Identifiers

PMID32395682
PMCPMC7213582
OpenAlexW3013831431

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.