ReviewBiology methods & protocols2019
Applications of molecular networks in biomedicine.
Review in Biology methods & protocols, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- A review of causal discovery methods for molecular network analysis.Molecular genetics & genomic medicine · 2022Review
- Network-Based Methods for Approaching Human Pathologies from a Phenotypic Point of View.Genes · 2022Review
- Systematic analysis to identify transcriptome-wide dysregulation of Alzheimer's disease in genes and isoforms.Human genetics · 2021Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Due to the large interdependence between the molecular components of living systems, many phenomena, including those related to pathologies, cannot be explained in terms of a single gene or a small number of genes. Molecular networks, representing different types of relationships between molecular entities, embody these large sets of interdependences in a framework that allow their mining from a systemic point of view to obtain information. These networks, often generated from high-throughput omics datasets, are used to study the complex phenomena of human pathologies from a systemic point of view. Complementing the reductionist approach of molecular biology, based on the detailed study of a small number of genes, systemic approaches to human diseases consider that these are better reflected in large and intricate networks of relationships between genes. These networks, and not the single genes, provide both better markers for diagnosing diseases and targets for treating them. Network approaches are being used to gain insight into the molecular basis of complex diseases and interpret the large datasets associated with them, such as genomic variants. Network formalism is also suitable for integrating large, heterogeneous and multilevel datasets associated with diseases from the molecular level to organismal and epidemiological scales. Many of these approaches are available to nonexpert users through standard software packages.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.