ArticleCentral European journal of urology2020
Efficacy and safety of fURS in stones larger than 20 mm: is it still the threshold?
Article in Central European journal of urology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06138704 (Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery Results and Stone-free Rate in Children With Kidney Stones), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery Results and Stone-free Rate in Children With Kidney Stones
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Retrospective analysis of flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy using end-fire, flexible negative-pressure ureteral access sheath for the management of 2-3-cm kidney stones.The Journal of international medical research · 2025Article
- Bilateral synchronous percutaneous nephrolithotomy in single session: A case from a district hospital.Urology case reports · 2025Article
- Review
- Small Diameter (7.5 Fr) Single-Use Flexible Ureteroscopy with Direct In-Scope Suction (DISSJournal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Safety and efficacy of ureteroscopy and laser lithotripsy with a single-use 7.5Fr ureteroscope: a multicenter prospective pilot study.Central European journal of urology · 2024Article
- Article
- Risk factors for infectious complications after retrograde intrarenal surgery - a systematic review and narrative synthesis.Central European journal of urology · 2021Review
- Clinical comparative study of standard channel percutaneous nephroscope combined with flexible ureteroscope and traditional standard channel combined with microchannel percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the treatment of multiple renal calculi without hydronephrosis.Pakistan journal of medical sciencesArticle
- Comparison of the efficacy and safety of flexible vacuum-assisted ureteral access sheath-assisted flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy, conventional ureteral access sheath-assisted flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy, and mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy for 2-3 cm renal stones.Therapeutic advances in urologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe aim of this article was to evaluate the safety and efficiency of flexible ureteroscopy (fURS) in the management of renal calculi larger than 20 mm. MATERIAL AND
methodsA total of 92 cases with renal calculi were managed with fURS and divided into two groups depending on the size of the stones; <20 mm and >20 mm (Group 1 and Group 2, respectively). The groups were compared with respect to treatment-related parameters including success, complication rates, hospitalization period and need for auxiliary procedures with an emphasis on the rate of infections. Success rates were also compared in each group according to stone location.
resultsOverall success rates after 3 months showed that stone-free rates in both groups were 84.1% (< 20 mm) and 58.33% (>20 mm) respectively (p = 0.008). The success rates of upper/mid pole (100% vs. 80%) and pelvis stones (83.3% vs. 75%) showed no statistically significant difference (p = 0.5, p = 0.51 respectively). Success rates for stones located in the lower pole were 75% vs. 14.28% respectively (p = 0.008). The rate of infectious complications was significantly higher in cases undergoing fURS for relatively larger stones (22.9%) as compared to smaller calculi (6.8%) (p = 0.032). No complications were recorded in Group 1, while 2 cases in Group 2 (4.1%) developed ureteral stricture.
conclusionsDespite the relatively low stone-free rates in lower pole stones, our current results indicate that fURS can be an effective and safe treatment alternative to PNL in larger renal stones (>20 mm) located in the pelvis and in the upper part of the calyceal system of the involved kidney.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.