ReviewJournal of thoracic disease2020
The conundrum of contrast-induced acute kidney injury.
Review in Journal of thoracic disease, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Predictors for Irreversibility of Contrast-Induced Acute Kidney Injury in Patients with Obesity After Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomography Coronary Angiography.Advances in therapy · 2025Article
- Contrast induced nephropathy in women with infertility undergoing hysterosalpingography.Reproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E · 2024Article
- Specificity of severe AKI aetiology and care in the elderly. The IRACIBLE prospective cohort study.Journal of nephrology · 2022Article
- A multiple-metabolites model to predict preliminary renal injury induced by iodixanol based on UHPLC/Q-Orbitrap-MS andMetabolomics : Official journal of the Metabolomic Society · 2022Article
- Predictive value of combining the level of fibrinogen and CHA2DS2-VASC Score for contrast-induced acute kidney injury in patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.International urology and nephrology · 2022Article
- Article
- Should Percutaneous Coronary Intervention be the Standard Treatment Strategy for Significant Coronary Artery Disease in all Octogenarians?Current cardiology reviews · 2021Article
- Contrast-induced nephropathy and oxidative stress: mechanistic insights for better interventional approaches.Journal of translational medicine · 2020Review
- Molecular Mechanisms of AKI in the Elderly: From Animal Models to Therapeutic Intervention.Journal of clinical medicine · 2020Review
- Current topics in interventional cardiology.Journal of thoracic disease · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
More than sixty years have elapsed since contrast induced nephropathy (CIN) was first described in the medical literature. This term has since been extensively explored, with a variety of studies conducted to investigate its incidence and various mechanisms examined to explain its pathophysiology. However, the topic of CIN remains one of controversy with a widely variable and often questionable incidence derived from various studies. The past two decades have seen a surge in reports questioning the existing of CIN altogether and if more harm is actually being caused to patients out of fear of this potential complication. We have attempted to review relevant studies regarding CIN and highlight the key points of its surmised understanding. The review has a higher focus on more recent literature and updates, in order to determine if an accurate estimate can be made on the incidence of CIN. While there was certainly no lack of material available, practically all the studies reviewed were limited by one or more significant drawbacks that limited the reliability of their conclusions regarding CIN. Based on the information reviewed, the strengths and the flaws encountered in other studies can be used to design a randomized control trial that may help in concluding the longstanding debate on this topic. However due to time, financial, and perhaps even ethical constraints such a trial will be difficult to arrange, and so a definitive answer on CI-AKI, and whether it really exist, may continue to elude clinicians.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.