Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32394686›Full record

Trial reportTurkish journal of medical sciences2020

Evaluation of the cardioprotective effects of crystalloid del Nido cardioplegia solution via a rapid and accurate cardiac marker: heart-type fatty acid-binding protein

Mehmet Kirişci, Aydemir Koçarslan, Duygun Altintaş Aykan, Filiz Alkan Baylan, Adem Doğaner, Yavuz Orak

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Turkish journal of medical sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Protective Efficacy on Adult Ischemic Myocardium under Bypass: Del Nido vs. St. Thomas Blood Cardioplegia.Annals of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery : official journal of the Association of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeons of Asia · 2023
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mehmet KirişciDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam University, Kahramanmaraş, TurkeyORCID 0000-0002-9618-4283
Aydemir KoçarslanDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam University, Kahramanmaraş, TurkeyORCID 0000-0003-3874-8762
Duygun Altintaş AykanDepartment of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam University, Kahramanmaraş, TurkeyORCID 0000-0001-8224-4006
Filiz Alkan BaylanDepartment of Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine, Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam University, Kahramanmaraş, TurkeyORCID 0000-0003-3117-7768
Adem DoğanerDepartment of Biostatistics, Faculty of Medicine, Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam University, Kahramanmaraş, TurkeyORCID 0000-0002-0270-9350
Yavuz OrakDepartment of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Faculty of Medicine, Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam University, Kahramanmaraş, TurkeyORCID 0000-0002-8356-6223
Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background/aim: Our aim in this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of crystalloid del Nido solution and cold blood cardioplegia solution on clinical and laboratory parameters. Materials and methods: Sixty patients who underwent elective coronary bypass operation between July 2019 and January 2020 were included in our study. Patients were divided into 2 groups of 30 patients using del Nido solution (DNS) and cold blood cardioplegia solution (CBCS), which were given for cardiac arrest. Demographic data, preoperative, postoperative 0th h, 6th h and 4th day creatine kinase myocardial band (CK-MB) and troponin I values were compared with a specific cardiac enzyme heart-type fatty acid-binding protein (H-FABP). Results: We found that aortic cross clamp duration and cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) time were shorter in patients using del Nido solution than cold blood cardioplegia solution (57.30 ± 23.57 min, 76.07 ± 27.18 min, P = 0.006) (95.07 ± 23.06 min, 114.13 ± 33.93, P = 0.014). Total cardioplegia solution volume was higher in the cold blood cardioplegia solution group (1426.67 ± 416.00 vs. 1200 ± 310.73 P = 0.02). Preoperative and postoperative levels of cardiac enzymes including CK-MB, troponin I and H-FABP were comparable in del Nido solution and cold blood cardioplegia solution groups. Conclusion: According to these results, when we compare both demographic data and CK-MB, troponin I and H-FABP levels, both cardioplegia solutions were comparable regarding safety and efficacy in terms of myocardial protection.

Indexed as

Cardioplegic SolutionsCoronary Artery BypassCreatine Kinase, MB FormFatty Acid Binding Protein 3FemaleHeart ArrestHumansMaleMiddle AgedTroponin ICardioplegic SolutionsCreatine Kinase, MB FormFABP3 protein, humanFatty Acid Binding Protein 3Troponin Icold blood cardioplegia solutioncoroner artery bypass graftingdel Nido solutionHeart-type fatty acid-binding proteinmyocardial protection

Identifiers

PMID32394686
PMCPMC7379457
OpenAlexW3027878820

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.