Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32394467›Full record

ReviewJournal of cellular physiology2020

A global treatments for coronaviruses including COVID-19.

Bahman Yousefi, Saeid Valizadeh, Hadi Ghaffari, Azadeh Vahedi, Mohsen Karbalaei, Majid Eslami

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of cellular physiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 58 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
58citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

58 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 123 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Estimating the causal effects of multiple intermittent treatments with application to COVID-19.Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series C, Applied statistics · 2023
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Molecular advances in microbial α-galactosidases: challenges and prospects.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2022
    Review
  20. A validated UHPLC-MS/MS method for simultaneous quantification of some repurposed COVID-19 drugs in rat plasma: Application to a pharmacokinetic study.Microchemical journal : devoted to the application of microtechniques in all branches of science · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Bahman YousefiDepartment of Immunology, Semnan University of Medical Sciences, Semnan, Iran.ORCID 0000-0002-9889-2195
Saeid ValizadehDepartment of Bacteriology and Virology, Semnan University of Medical Sciences, Semnan, Iran.
Hadi GhaffariDepartment of Bacteriology and Virology, Semnan University of Medical Sciences, Semnan, Iran.
Azadeh VahediDepartment of Bacteriology and Virology, Semnan University of Medical Sciences, Semnan, Iran.
Mohsen KarbalaeiDepartment of Microbiology and Virology, School of Medicine, Jiroft University of Medical Sciences, Jiroft, Iran.
Majid EslamiDepartment of Bacteriology and Virology, Semnan University of Medical Sciences, Semnan, Iran.ORCID 0000-0001-5118-678X
Semnan University of Medical Sciences · IRUniversity of Jiroft · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In late December 2019 in Wuhan, China, several patients with viral pneumonia were identified as 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV). So far, there are no specific treatments for patients with coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19), and the treatments available today are based on previous experience with similar viruses such as severe acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus (SARS-CoV), Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV), and Influenza virus. In this article, we have tried to reach a therapeutic window of drugs available to patients with COVID-19. Cathepsin L is required for entry of the 2019-nCoV virus into the cell as target teicoplanin inhibits virus replication. Angiotensin-converting-enzyme 2 (ACE2) in soluble form as a recombinant protein can prevent the spread of coronavirus by restricting binding and entry. In patients with COVID-19, hydroxychloroquine decreases the inflammatory response and cytokine storm, but overdose causes toxicity and mortality. Neuraminidase inhibitors such as oseltamivir, peramivir, and zanamivir are invalid for 2019-nCoV and are not recommended for treatment but protease inhibitors such as lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) inhibit the progression of MERS-CoV disease and can be useful for patients of COVID-19 and, in combination with Arbidol, has a direct antiviral effect on early replication of SARS-CoV. Ribavirin reduces hemoglobin concentrations in respiratory patients, and remdesivir improves respiratory symptoms. Use of ribavirin in combination with LPV/r in patients with SARS-CoV reduces acute respiratory distress syndrome and mortality, which has a significant protective effect with the addition of corticosteroids. Favipiravir increases clinical recovery and reduces respiratory problems and has a stronger antiviral effect than LPV/r. currently, appropriate treatment for patients with COVID-19 is an ACE2 inhibitor and a clinical problem reducing agent such as favipiravir in addition to hydroxychloroquine and corticosteroids.

Indexed as

Antiviral AgentsBetacoronavirusCoronavirus InfectionsCOVID-19COVID-19 Drug TreatmentHumansMiddle East Respiratory Syndrome CoronavirusPandemicsPneumonia, ViralSARS-CoV-2Virus ReplicationAntiviral AgentsantiviralcoronavirusCOVID-19drugtreatment

Identifiers

PMID32394467
PMCPMC7273044
OpenAlexW3024695447

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.