Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32394345›Full record

Trial reportInfection2020

High effectiveness of recommended first-line antiretroviral therapies in Germany: a nationwide, prospective cohort study.

Markus Bickel, Christian Hoffmann, Eva Wolf, Axel Baumgarten, Christoph Wyen, Christoph D Spinner, Hans Jäger, Nils Postel, Stefan Esser, Markus Mueller and 5 more

Abstract readClinical Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Infection, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. [HIV First Diagnoses in Germany in 2014 - A Regional Analysis].Gesundheitswesen (Bundesverband der Arzte des Offentlichen Gesundheitsdienstes (Germany)) · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Markus BickelInfektiologikum Frankfurt, Stresemannallee 3, 60596, Frankfurt, Germany. bickel@infektiologikum.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6737-5104
Christian HoffmannICH Study Center, Hamburg, Germany.
Eva WolfMUC Research, Munich, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1678-8520
Axel BaumgartenCenter for Infectiology Berlin Prenzlauer Berg GmbH (Zibp), Berlin, Germany.
Christoph WyenPraxis Ebertplatz, Cologne, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5158-5473
Christoph D SpinnerSchool of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3875-5367
Hans JägerMVZ Karlsplatz, HIV Research and Clinical Care Centre, Munich, Germany.
Nils Postelprinzmed, Practice for Infectious Diseases, Munich, Germany.
Stefan EsserDepartment of Dermatology and Venerology, University Hospital, University HIV/STD Center Essen, Essen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3625-9650
Markus Mueller, Practice Schwabstrasse 26, Stuttgart, Germany.
Albrecht Stoehrifi Studien und Projekte GmbH an der Asklepios Klinik St. Georg, Hamburg, Germany.
Stefan PreisClinovate NET, Munich, Germany.
Stephan KlaukeInfektiologikum Frankfurt, Stresemannallee 3, 60596, Frankfurt, Germany.
Knud ScheweICH Study Center, Hamburg, Germany.
PROPHET study group of dagnae e.V.
Infektionsmedizinisches Centrum Hamburg · DEEssen University Hospital · DEFriedrich-Ebert-Stiftung e.V. · DEGoethe University Frankfurt · DEAsklepios Klinik St. Georg · DEMUC Research (Germany) · DEMünchen Klinik Schwabing · DETechnical University of Munich · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeCurrent German/Austrian antiretroviral treatment guidelines recommend more than 20 combination regimens for first-line therapy, without a preference. Regimens include two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) plus either an integrase strand transfer inhibitor (INSTI), a non-NRTI (NNRTI) or a boosted protease inhibitor (PI). The objective was to examine the outcomes of recommended first-line ART in Germany.

methodsThis nationwide observational study included treatment-naïve chronically HIV-1 infected patients receiving one of the recommended first-line regimens. Patients were allocated to three arms (INSTI, NNRTI, PI) and were prospectively followed for 24 months. Delayed treatment initiation was defined by a baseline CD4 T-cell count of < 350/µl or CDC clinical stage C.

resultsAmong a total of 434 patients enrolled, virologic failure was rare and occurred in 4.3% (6/141) in the PI arm, in 3.3% (4/122) in the NNRTI arm and in 0.6% (1/171) in the INSTI arm (p = 0.10). De novo drug resistance mutations developed in only two patients in the NNRTI arm. Nonetheless, treatment modifications were frequent (51%) and mostly performed for strategic reasons. Retention on all initial compounds at month 24 was 64%, 49%, and 22% in the INSTI, NNRTI and PI arms respectively. Delayed treatment initiation was common (47%) and more frequently observed in patients in the PI arm. It was not associated with virological failure.

conclusionHigh efficacy and low virological failure rates were observed with recommended first-line regimens independent of delayed treatment initiation, chosen regimen and subsequent treatment modifications, demonstrating the validity of the current treatment guidelines.

Indexed as

AdultAnti-Retroviral AgentsFemaleGermanyHIV-1HIV InfectionsHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesAnti-Retroviral AgentsAntiretroviral therapyEffectivenessFirst-line treatmentHIVTreatment modification

Identifiers

PMID32394345
OpenAlexW3025504664

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.