Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32394169›Full record

ArticleSurgical endoscopy2021

Gastrocutaneous fistulas after PEG removal in adult cancer patients: frequency and treatment options.

P Currais, S Faias, F Francisco, L Sousa, J Gramacho, A Dias Pereira

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Endoscopic removal of a weight-loss device with stoma closure using a tack-and-suture device.VideoGIE : an official video journal of the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Gastroenterologist's Guide to Gastrostomies.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2022
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

P CurraisGastroenterology Department - Instituto Português de Oncologia de Lisboa Francisco Gentil, Lisbon, Portugal. pedro_currais@live.com.pt.ORCID 0000-0003-1470-655X
S FaiasGastroenterology Department - Instituto Português de Oncologia de Lisboa Francisco Gentil, Lisbon, Portugal.
F FranciscoGastroenterology Department - Instituto Português de Oncologia de Lisboa Francisco Gentil, Lisbon, Portugal.
L SousaGastroenterology Department - Instituto Português de Oncologia de Lisboa Francisco Gentil, Lisbon, Portugal.
J GramachoGastroenterology Department - Instituto Português de Oncologia de Lisboa Francisco Gentil, Lisbon, Portugal.
A Dias PereiraGastroenterology Department - Instituto Português de Oncologia de Lisboa Francisco Gentil, Lisbon, Portugal.
Instituto Português de Oncologia de Coimbra Francisco Gentil · PT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND

aimsPEG removal in head and neck cancer patients (HNCPs) is performed after treatment, in case of disease remission and after adequate oral intake is resumed. The PEG tract usually closes spontaneously within 2-3 days. Persistent gastrocutaneous fistula (GCF) is a rare complication after PEG tube removal and is characterized by the persistence of gastric leakage through the fistulous tract for more than 1 month. Our main goal was to access the incidence and the success of a treatment algorithm for GCF in HNCPs.

methodsRetrospective unicentric study of HNCPs referred for PEG removal between 2014 and 2018. The patients with GCF were selected and their sequential treatment was reviewed.

resultsIn 331 patients with PEGs removed, 19 (5.7%) GCFs were documented. Medical therapy (4-8 weeks) was performed with clinical success (definitive closure of the GCF) in 12 (63.2%) patients. The remaining seven patients required endoscopic or surgical treatment. In four, endoscopic treatment had technical and clinical success (in three patients with fulguration of the gastric leak edges with argon plasma coagulation, silver nitrate in the path and external orifice, and closure of the internal orifice with hemoclips and in one with an over-the-scope-clip). Only three patients underwent surgery, one due to clinical failure of sequential endoscopic therapy and two had direct surgery.

conclusionGCF occurs rarely after PEG removal in HNCPs. Medical therapy is usually effective and should be maintained for at least 8 weeks. Endoscopic therapy is an effective second-line option with and surgery rarely required.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCutaneous FistulaDevice RemovalElectrocoagulationEndoscopyFemaleGastric FistulaGastrostomyHead and Neck NeoplasmsHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesEndoscopic therapyHead and neck cancer patientsPercutaneous endoscopic gastrostomyPersistent gastrocutaneous fistula

Identifiers

PMID32394169
OpenAlexW3024728675

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.