Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32394111›Full record

ArticleArchives of sexual behavior2020

Comparing National Probability and Community-Based Samples of Sexual Minority Adults: Implications and Recommendations for Sampling and Measurement.

Evan A Krueger, Jessica N Fish, Phillip L Hammack, Marguerita Lightfoot, Meg D Bishop, Stephen T Russell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of sexual behavior, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Sexual Orientation and Gender Diversity Research Manuscript Writing Guide.Psychology of sexual orientation and gender diversity · 2024
    Article
  4. Minority stress and romantic relationship functioning among young sexual minority women.Journal of family psychology : JFP : journal of the Division of Family Psychology of the American Psychological Association (Division 43) · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Evan A KruegerDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, 2001 N. Soto St., 302-04, Los Angeles, CA, 90032, USA. eakruege@usc.edu.
Jessica N FishDepartment of Family Science, University of Maryland School of Public Health, College Park, MD, USA.
Phillip L HammackDepartment of Psychology, University of California, Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA, USA.
Marguerita LightfootDepartment of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Meg D BishopDepartment of Human Development and Family Sciences, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.
Stephen T RussellDepartment of Human Development and Family Sciences, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.

Funding

Training Program in Population StudiesT32HD007081 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AUSTIN · PI Aprile Dawn Benner, Abigail Mae Weitzman · 1985 to 2026
$6.8M
Scientific & Technical CoreP2CHD042849 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI Elizabeth T. Gershoff · 2017 to 2026
$5.2M
Increasing Effective Mental Health Care for LGBT ClientsU48DP006382 · DP · UNIV OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK · PI BOEKELOO, BRADLEY O · 2018 to 2023
$4.2M
Identity Stress and Health in Three Cohorts of LGB individualsR01HD078526 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI MEYER, ILAN H · 2014 to 2018
$4.1M
Sci-Tech Core-Maryland Population Research CenterP2CHD041041 · NICHD · UNIV OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK · PI Susan W Parker · 2018 to 2026
$3.9M
NCCDPHP CDC HHS U48 DP006382NICHD NIH HHS P2C HD041041NICHD NIH HHS P2C HD042849NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD078526NICHD NIH HHS T32 HD007081
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Scientific evidence regarding sexual minority populations has generally come from studies based on two types of samples: community-derived samples and probability samples. Probability samples are lauded as the gold standard of population research for their ability to represent the population of interest. However, while studies using community samples lack generalizability, they are often better able to assess population-specific concerns (e.g., minority stress) and are collected more rapidly, allowing them to be more responsive to changing population dynamics. Given these advantages, many sexual minority population studies rely on community samples. To identify how probability and community samples of sexual minorities are similar and different, we compared participant characteristics from two companion samples from the Generations Study, each designed with the same demographic profile of U.S. sexual minority adults in mind. The first sample was recruited for a national probability survey, whereas the second was recruited for a multicommunity sample from four U.S. cities. We examined sociodemographic differences between the samples. Although there were several statistical differences between samples, the effect sizes were small for sociodemographic characteristics that defined the sample inclusion criteria: sex assigned at birth, race/ethnicity, and age cohort. The samples differed across other characteristics: bisexual respondents, respondents with less education, and those living in non-urban areas were underrepresented in the community sample. Our findings offer insights for recruiting community samples of sexual minority populations and for measuring sexual identity on probability surveys. They also bolster confidence in well-designed community samples as sources for data on sexual minority populations.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSampling StudiesSexual and Gender MinoritiesSexual BehaviorSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultCommunity sampleProbability sampleSamplingSexual identitySexual orientation

Identifiers

PMID32394111
PMCPMC7305965

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.