Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32394071›Full record

ArticleInternational archives of occupational and environmental health2020

External validation of a prediction model and decision tree for sickness absence due to mental disorders.

Marieke F A van Hoffen, Giny Norder, Jos W R Twisk, Corné A M Roelen

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in International archives of occupational and environmental health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. External validation of a predictive model for post-treatment persistent disease byEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Marieke F A van HoffenDepartment of Research and Development, Human Total Care, Utrecht, The Netherlands. m.van.hoffen@humancapitalcare.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1563-5327
Giny NorderDepartment of Research and Development, Human Total Care, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Jos W R TwiskDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, Location VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Corné A M RoelenDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, Location VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeA previously developed prediction model and decision tree were externally validated for their ability to identify occupational health survey participants at increased risk of long-term sickness absence (LTSA) due to mental disorders.

methodsThe study population consisted of N = 3415 employees in mobility services who were invited in 2016 for an occupational health survey, consisting of an online questionnaire measuring the health status and working conditions, followed by a preventive consultation with an occupational health provider (OHP). The survey variables of the previously developed prediction model and decision tree were used for predicting mental LTSA (no = 0, yes = 1) at 1-year follow-up. Discrimination between survey participants with and without mental LTSA was investigated with the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC).

resultsA total of n = 1736 (51%) non-sick-listed employees participated in the survey and 51 (3%) of them had mental LTSA during follow-up. The prediction model discriminated (AUC = 0.700; 95% CI 0.628-0.773) between participants with and without mental LTSA during follow-up. Discrimination by the decision tree (AUC = 0.671; 95% CI 0.589-0.753) did not differ significantly (p = 0.62) from discrimination by the prediction model.

conclusionAt external validation, the prediction model and the decision tree both poorly identified occupational health survey participants at increased risk of mental LTSA. OHPs could use the decision tree to determine if mental LTSA risk factors should be explored in the preventive consultation which follows after completing the survey questionnaire.

Indexed as

Decision TreesSurveys and QuestionnairesAdultCohort StudiesFemaleHumansJob SatisfactionMaleMental DisordersMiddle AgedModels, StatisticalNetherlandsOccupational Health ServicesProspective StudiesSick LeaveSocial SupportHealth surveysMental healthReproducibility of resultsROC analysisValidation studies

Identifiers

PMID32394071
PMCPMC7519895

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.