ReviewPediatric surgery international2020
Ethics of randomized trials in pediatric surgery.
Review in Pediatric surgery international, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical Trials of Liposomes in Children's Anticancer Therapy: A Comprehensive Analysis of Trials Registered on ClinicalTrials.gov.International journal of nanomedicine · 2022Trial
- Using a Respectful Approach to Child-centred Healthcare (ReACH) in a paediatric clinical trial: A feasibility study.PloS one · 2020Trial
- The state of targeted therapeutic pharmacological approaches in pediatric neurosurgery: report from the European Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery (ESPN) Consensus Conference 2024.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2025Review
- Quality of randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews in pediatric surgery: A cross-sectional meta-research study.Cochrane evidence synthesis and methods · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To provide the best evidence-based treatment for children, and timely evaluation of innovations, the role of the pediatric surgeon's participation in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and prospective comparative studies is required. The ethical considerations of pediatric surgical RCTs pose unique practical difficulties in the design and performance of clinical trials in children. There are several ethical issues unique to pediatric surgical RCTs: diseases with low volume, an inability to conduct Phase 1 and 2 trials, parental emotional involvement, difficulty with recruitment in surgical trials, volume, and modified study design, issues with permission vs. assent and investigator bias. This article reviews the ethical aspects unique to pediatric surgical RCTs and prospective comparative studies.Level of evidence: Level 3.
Indexed as
Identifiers
32394059What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.