Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32394055›Full record

ArticleNeurotoxicity research2020

Evolutionary Interpretations of Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptor Targeting Venom Effects by a Clade of Asian Viperidae Snakes.

Richard J Harris, Christina N Zdenek, Jordan Debono, David Harrich, Bryan G Fry

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Neurotoxicity research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Toxins · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Toxins · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Richard J HarrisVenom Evolution Lab, University of Queensland, School of Biological Sciences, Brisbane, Queensland, 4072, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4412-2275
Christina N ZdenekVenom Evolution Lab, University of Queensland, School of Biological Sciences, Brisbane, Queensland, 4072, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0385-500X
Jordan DebonoVenom Evolution Lab, University of Queensland, School of Biological Sciences, Brisbane, Queensland, 4072, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4157-5818
David HarrichQIMR Berghofer, Royal Brisbane Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, 4029, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3690-0150
Bryan G FryVenom Evolution Lab, University of Queensland, School of Biological Sciences, Brisbane, Queensland, 4072, Australia. bgfry@uq.edu.au.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6661-1283
The University of Queensland · AUQIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute · AU

Funding

Australian Research Council (AU) DP190100304.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ecological variability among closely related species provides an opportunity for evolutionary comparative studies. Therefore, to investigate the origin and evolution of neurotoxicity in Asian viperid snakes, we tested the venoms of Azemiops feae, Calloselasma rhodostoma, Deinagkistrodon acutus, Tropidolaeums subannulatus, and T. wagleri for their relative specificity and potency upon the amphibian, lizard, bird, rodent, and human α-1 (neuromuscular) nicotinic acetylcholine receptors. We utilised a biolayer interferometry assay to test the binding affinity of these pit viper venoms to orthosteric mimotopes of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors binding region from a diversity of potential prey types. The Tropidolaemus venoms were much more potent than the other species tested, which is consistent with the greater prey escape potential in arboreal niches. Intriguingly, the venom of C. rhodostoma showed neurotoxic binding to the α-1 mimotopes, a feature not known previously for this species. The lack of prior knowledge of neurotoxicity in this species is consistent with our results due to the bias in rodent studies and human bite reports, whilst this venom had a greater binding affinity toward amphibian and diapsid α-1 targets. The other large terrestrial species, D. acutus, did not display any meaningful levels of neurotoxicity. These results demonstrate that whilst small peptide neurotoxins are a basal trait of these snakes, it has been independently amplified on two separate occasions, once in Azemiops and again in Tropidolaemus, and with Calloselasma representing a third possible amplification of this trait. These results also point to broader sources of novel neuroactive peptides with the potential for use as lead compounds in drug design and discovery.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularAmphibian ProteinsAmphibiansAnimalsBirdsCrotalid VenomsHumansInterferometryLizardsNeurotoxicity SyndromesNeurotoxinsPeptidesReceptors, NicotinicRodentiaViper VenomsAmphibian ProteinsAzemiops feae venomazemiopsin protein, Azemiops feaeCHRNA1 protein, humanCrotalid VenomsNeurotoxinsPeptidesReceptors, NicotinicViper VenomswaglerinCrotalinaeEvolutionNeurotoxinsNicotinic acetylcholine receptorPit vipersPrey specificityViperidae

Identifiers

PMID32394055
OpenAlexW3024590918

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.