ArticleInternational journal of clinical oncology2020
Efficacy and safety of nivolumab for renal cell carcinoma in patients over 75 years old from multiple Japanese institutes.
Article in International journal of clinical oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effectiveness and safety of nivolumab and ipilimumab in older adults with renal cell carcinoma: findings from a multicenter observational study in Poland.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Primary resistance to nivolumab plus ipilimumab therapy in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma.Cancer medicine · 2023Article
- Article
- Real-World Experience with Nivolumab in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Patients Who Have Progressed on Prior Therapies: A Single-Center Study from India.South Asian journal of cancer · 2022Article
- Aging, cancer, and antitumor immunity.International journal of clinical oncology · 2022Review
- Efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors in elderly patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma.International urology and nephrology · 2022Article
- Comparison of nivolumab plus ipilimumab with tyrosine kinase inhibitors as first-line therapies for metastatic renal-cell carcinoma: a multicenter retrospective study.International journal of clinical oncology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeDespite nivolumab being increasingly used for treating metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC), differing findings have been reported about its efficacy and safety in elderly patients. Thus, this study was aimed at evaluating nivolumab's efficacy and safety for treating mRCC in Japanese patients aged ≥ 75 years.
methodsFrom March 2013 to August 2019, 118 mRCC patients (89 men and 29 women) were treated with nivolumab. The objective response rates (ORRs) were compared between patients aged ≥ 75 and < 75 years. Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and adverse events (AEs) were also compared between the two age-groups.
resultsThe median follow-up duration after nivolumab initiation was 10 months. At the time of nivolumab initiation, 22 and 96 patients were aged ≥ 75 and < 75 years, respectively. Intergroup differences in patient characteristics except for age were not significant. Furthermore, intergroup differences in ORR (14 vs 23%; P = 0.367), PFS (HR 0.74, 95% CI 0.37-1.51; P = 0.414), and median OS (HR 1.29, 95% CI 0.68-2.46; P = 0.433) were not significant. The incidence of nivolumab discontinuation due to AEs was significantly higher in the ≥ 75 years group (27% vs 7%; P = 0.028), although the intergroup difference in the AE incidence rate was not significant (55% vs 43.8%; P = 0.535).
conclusionsNivolumab's effectiveness was comparable between the two patient groups, except for early AE-related discontinuation in the ≥ 75 year group.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.