Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32394045›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer survivorship : research and practice2020

Quality of life and the negative impact of comorbidities in long-term colorectal cancer survivors: a population-based comparison.

Amy Pate, Jan Lowery, Kristin Kilbourn, Patrick J Blatchford, Monica McNulty, Betsy Risendal

Abstract readComparative StudyMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Health-related quality of life and lifestyle in long-term survivors of colorectal cancer and a matched non-cancer reference group.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Symptom burden, psychological distress, and health-related quality of life in cancer survivors with pelvic late radiation tissue injuries.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Amy PatePreventive Medicine Residency, University of Colorado-Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA.
Jan LoweryDepartment of Epidemiology, Colorado School of Public Health, Aurora, CO, USA.
Kristin KilbournDepartment of Psychology, University of Colorado Denver, Denver, CO, USA.
Patrick J BlatchfordDepartment of Biostatistics and Informatics, Colorado School of Public Health, Aurora, CO, USA.
Monica McNultyDepartment of Biostatistics and Informatics, Colorado School of Public Health, Aurora, CO, USA.
Betsy RisendalDepartment of Community and Behavioral Health, Colorado School of Public Health, 13001 E. 17th Place, Bldg 500, MS F538, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA. betsy.risendal@cuanschutz.edu.
Colorado School of Public Health · USUniversity of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus · USUniversity of Colorado Denver · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeColorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer in the USA. The objective of this study was to compare quality of life (QoL) across long-term colorectal cancer survivors and unaffected matched controls while adjusting for comorbidities.

methodsThe National Cancer Institute (NCI)-funded Colon Cancer Family Registry (CCFR) was used to randomly select and recruit CRC survivors (≥ 5 years from diagnosis) and matched controls for a cross-sectional survey. Nine geographically diverse sites in the USA from the CCFR participated in the study. Telephone interviews were conducted using computer-assisted methods to assess QoL.

resultsA total of 403 cases and 401 controls were included in the final sample. Unadjusted comparison revealed no significant difference between CRC survivors and controls with respect to measures of fatigue, social, emotional, functional, and physical well-being. Multivariate logistic regression revealed that case status had a significant negative influence on colorectal cancer-specific QoL measures. Higher comorbidity indices had a significant negative influence on overall QoL regardless of case status.

conclusionsQuality of life among long-term CRC survivors is similar to control subjects, with the exception of worse CRC-specific QoL measures. Higher comorbidity indices were independently associated with poor QoL for both cases and controls. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Survivors and healthcare providers should be aware that long-term QoL is comparable to the general population; however, there is potential that digestive tract-specific issues may persist.

Indexed as

Quality of LifeAgedCancer SurvivorsCase-Control StudiesColorectal NeoplasmsComorbidityCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHealth StatusHumansMaleMiddle AgedRegistriesUnited StatesColon cancerColorectal cancerGlobal quality of lifeLong-term survivorshipQuality of life

Identifiers

PMID32394045
OpenAlexW3024065412

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.