Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32394036›Full record

ArticleExperimental & applied acarology2020

Molecular investigation of Rickettsia spp. and Francisella tularensis in ticks from three provinces of Turkey.

Samiye Demir, Sedef Erkunt Alak, Ahmet Efe Köseoğlu, Cemal Ün, Muhammed Nalçacı, Hüseyin Can

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental & applied acarology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Serological and Molecular Detection ofMediterranean journal of hematology and infectious diseases · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. First molecular detection ofInternational journal for parasitology. Parasites and wildlife · 2024
    Article
  10. Molecular Survey ofVeterinary sciences · 2023
    Article
  11. First report of spotted fever groupFrontiers in microbiology · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Samiye DemirZoology Section, Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Ege University, Bornova, İzmir, Turkey.
Sedef Erkunt AlakMolecular Biology Section, Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Ege University, Bornova, İzmir, Turkey.
Ahmet Efe KöseoğluMolecular Biology Section, Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Ege University, Bornova, İzmir, Turkey.
Cemal ÜnMolecular Biology Section, Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Ege University, Bornova, İzmir, Turkey.
Muhammed NalçacıZoology Section, Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Ege University, Bornova, İzmir, Turkey.
Hüseyin CanMolecular Biology Section, Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Ege University, Bornova, İzmir, Turkey. huseyin.can@ege.edu.tr.
Ege University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ticks are obligate hematophagous ectoparasites as well as mechanical and biological vectors of a wide variety of microbial pathogens. To date, 19 tick-borne diseases have been reported from Turkey. In this study, ticks collected from Aydın, İzmir and Şanlıurfa provinces of Turkey were identified using morphological and molecular methods. After the presence of bacterial DNA was checked, Rickettsia spp. and Francisella tularensis were investigated in bacterial DNA-positive tick specimens by PCR. Furthermore, amplicons belonging to tick specimens and positive bacterial samples were sequenced and processed for BLAST, alignment and phylogenetic analysis. As a result, seven tick species were identified: Rhipicephalus sanguineus, Rh. bursa, Rh. turanicus, Hyalomma marginatum, Hy. aegyptium, Hy. anatolicum and Haemaphysalis erinacei. Fifty-five tick specimens tested positive for bacterial DNA and among them, rickettsial DNA was found in five ticks (infection rate = 9.1%) belonging to Hy. marginatum, Hy. aegyptium, Rh. bursa and Rh. turanicus. Of the five Rickettsia-positive ticks, three contained Rickettsia aeschlimannii, one Ri. massiliae and one an unidentified Rickettsia sp. No Francisella tularensis DNA was detected. Sequence analysis of the ompB gene indicated two novel single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) in two different Ri. aeschlimannii strains and two novel SNPs as well as a novel insertion (GACGGT) were found in Rickettsia sp. This study indicated the presence of polymorphic Rickettsia species in ticks from Turkey.

Indexed as

Francisella tularensisRickettsiaAnimalsDNA, BacterialPhylogenyTurkeyDNA, BacterialFrancisella tularensisgltAHyalomma aegyptiumHyalomma marginatumompBRhipicephalus bursaRhipicephalus turanicusRickettsia aeschlimanniiRickettsia massiliae

Identifiers

PMID32394036
OpenAlexW3025445074

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.