Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32393997›Full record

ReviewEuropean archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience2021

Upscaling e-mental health in Europe: a six-country qualitative analysis and policy recommendations from the eMEN project.

Wolfgang Gaebel, R Lukies, A Kerst, J Stricker, J Zielasek, S Diekmann, N Trost, E Gouzoulis-Mayfrank, B Bonroy, K Cullen and 17 more

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. eHealth implementationFrontiers in digital health · 2024
    Article
  18. Digitalising mental health care: Practical recommendations from the European Psychiatric Association.European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists · 2023
    Review
  19. An update from the WPA Working Group on Digitalization in Mental Health and Care.World psychiatry : official journal of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA) · 2023
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

27 authors.

Wolfgang GaebelDepartment of Psychiatry, Medical Faculty, LVR-Klinikum Düsseldorf, Heinrich-Heine-University, Bergische Landstr. 2, 40629, Düsseldorf, Germany. wolfgang.gaebel@uni-duesseldorf.de.
R LukiesLVR-Institute for Healthcare Research, Cologne, Germany.
A KerstDepartment of Psychiatry, Medical Faculty, LVR-Klinikum Düsseldorf, Heinrich-Heine-University, Bergische Landstr. 2, 40629, Düsseldorf, Germany.
J StrickerDepartment of Psychiatry, Medical Faculty, LVR-Klinikum Düsseldorf, Heinrich-Heine-University, Bergische Landstr. 2, 40629, Düsseldorf, Germany.
J ZielasekLVR-Institute for Healthcare Research, Cologne, Germany.
S DiekmannLVR-Institute for Healthcare Research, Cologne, Germany.
N TrostLVR-Institute for Healthcare Research, Cologne, Germany.
E Gouzoulis-MayfrankLVR-Institute for Healthcare Research, Cologne, Germany.
B BonroyThomas More University of Applied Sciences, Geel, Belgium.
K CullenMental Health Reform, Dublin, Ireland.
K DesiePulso Europe, Leuven, Belgium.
A P Ewalds MulliezWHO Collaborating Centre for Research and Training in Mental Health-EPSM Lille-Métropole, Lille, France.
G GerlingerGerman Association for Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics e.V. (DGPPN), Berlin, Germany.
K GüntherGerman Association for Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics e.V. (DGPPN), Berlin, Germany.
H J HiemstraInserm, Clinical Epidemiology and Economic Evaluation Applied to Vulnerable Populations (ECEVE), Paris Diderot University, Paris, France.
S McDaidMental Health Reform, Dublin, Ireland.
C MurphyMental Health Foundation, London, UK.
J SanderGerman Association for Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics e.V. (DGPPN), Berlin, Germany.
D SebbaneWHO Collaborating Centre for Research and Training in Mental Health-EPSM Lille-Métropole, Lille, France.
J L RoelandtWHO Collaborating Centre for Research and Training in Mental Health-EPSM Lille-Métropole, Lille, France.
L ThorpeMental Health Foundation, London, UK.
D TopolskaMental Health Reform, Dublin, Ireland.
E Van AsscheThomas More University of Applied Sciences, Geel, Belgium.
T Van DaeleThomas More University of Applied Sciences, Geel, Belgium.
L Van den BroeckPulso Europe, Leuven, Belgium.
C VersluisStichting Arq, Diemen, The Netherlands.
O VlijterStichting Arq, Diemen, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

E-mental health (eMH) encompasses the use of digital technologies to deliver, support, or enhance mental health services. Despite the growing evidence for the effectiveness of eMH interventions, the process of implementation of eMH solutions in healthcare remains slow throughout Europe. To address this issue, the e-Mental Health Innovation and Transnational Implementation Platform North-West Europe (eMEN) project was initiated to increase the dissemination and quality of eMH services in Europe. In this project, status analyses regarding eMH in the six participating countries (i.e., Belgium, France, Germany, Ireland, The Netherlands, and the UK) were conducted and eight recommendations for eMH were developed. Expert teams from the six participating countries conducted status analyses regarding the uptake of eMH based on a narrative literature review and stakeholder interviews. Based on these status analyses, the eMEN consortium developed eight policy recommendations to further support the implementation of eMH in Europe. The status analyses showed that the participating countries are in different stages of implementing eMH into mental healthcare. Some barriers to implementing eMH were common among countries (e.g., a limited legal and regulatory framework), while others were country-specific (e.g., fragmented, federal policies). The policy recommendations included fostering awareness, creating strong political commitment, and setting reliable standards related to ethics and data security. The eMEN project has provided the initial recommendations to guide political and regulatory processes regarding eMH. Further research is needed to establish well-tailored implementation strategies and to assess the generalizability of the recommendations beyond the countries involved in the eMEN project.

Indexed as

Mental DisordersMental Health ServicesTelemedicineEuropeHealth PolicyHumansQualitative Researche-Mental healtheMHImplementationMental healthPolicyUpscaling

Identifiers

PMID32393997

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.