Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32393980›Full record

Trial reportThe American journal of clinical nutrition2020

Afternoon distraction: a high-saturated-fat meal and endotoxemia impact postmeal attention in a randomized crossover trial.

Annelise A Madison, Martha A Belury, Rebecca Andridge, M Rosie Shrout, Megan E Renna, William B Malarkey, Michael T Bailey, Janice K Kiecolt-Glaser

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The American journal of clinical nutrition, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04247763 (Fast Food, Fatigue, and Inflammation), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04247763 nacompletednot on this map

Fast Food, Fatigue, and Inflammation: The FOOD Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorOhio State University Comprehensive Cancer CenterRan2010 to 2013Enrolled58ConditionsBreast CancerArmsSaturated Fat Meal, Oleic Sunflower Oil Meal
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Saturated fat in an evolutionary context.Lipids in health and disease · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Annelise A MadisonInstitute for Behavioral Medicine Research, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH, USA.
Martha A BeluryInstitute for Behavioral Medicine Research, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH, USA.
Rebecca AndridgeInstitute for Behavioral Medicine Research, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH, USA.
M Rosie ShroutInstitute for Behavioral Medicine Research, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH, USA.
Megan E RennaInstitute for Behavioral Medicine Research, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH, USA.
William B MalarkeyInstitute for Behavioral Medicine Research, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH, USA.
Michael T BaileyInstitute for Behavioral Medicine Research, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH, USA.
Janice K Kiecolt-GlaserInstitute for Behavioral Medicine Research, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH, USA.
Institute for Behavioral Medicine · USNationwide Children's Hospital · US

Funding

Translational Therapeutics Research Program (TT)P30CA016058 · NCI · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI Daniel G. Stover · 1985 to 2026
$132.3M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016058
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSaturated-fat intake and endotoxemia can impair cognition. However, their acute impact on cognitive performance is unknown.

objectiveThis study assessed the impact of 2 high-fat meals and endotoxemia on attention.

methodsIn this double-blind, randomized crossover trial, 51 women (n = 32 breast cancer survivors, n = 19 noncancer controls; mean ± SD age: 53 ± 8 y) completed the Continuous Performance Test (CPT) and had their blood drawn to assess endotoxemia markers LPS binding protein (LBP), soluble CD14 (sCD14), and the LBP to sCD14 ratio 1 h prior to eating either a high-saturated-fat meal or a high-oleic-sunflower-oil meal. Women again completed the CPT 5 h postmeal. At 1 to 4 wk later, women completed the same protocol but consumed the other meal.

resultsIn adjusted models, women had more difficulty distinguishing target stimuli from distractors after consuming the high-saturated-fat meal than they did after the oleic-sunflower-oil meal (B = 4.44, SE = 1.88, P = 0.02). Women with higher baseline LBP had less consistent response times (B = 0.002, SE = 0.0008, P = 0.04). Those with higher LBP and LBP:sCD14 were less able to sustain their attention throughout the entire CPT, as reflected by their progressively slower (B = 0.002, SE = 0.0006, P = 0.003; and B = 2.43, SE = 0.090, P = 0.008, respectively) and more erratic (B = 0.003, SE = 0.0008, P < 0.0001; and B = 3.29, SE = 1.17, P = 0.006, respectively) response times. Additionally, women with higher baseline LBP or sCD14 were less able to maintain or increase response speeds at higher interstimulus intervals (B = 0.002, SE = 0.0006, P = 0.02; and B = 0.006, SE = 0.003, P = 0.03, respectively), indicating greater difficulty adapting to changing task demands. Significant meal type by LBP and LBP:sCD14 interactions emerged (P < 0.05), such that high LBP and LBP:sCD14 erased between-meal cognitive differences, uniformly impairing performance.

conclusionsThese results suggest that higher LBP, sCD14, and LBP:sCD14 and saturated-fat intake individually and jointly influence attention. Endotoxemia may override the relative cognitive benefit of healthier oil choices.This trial is registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT04247763.

Indexed as

Acute-Phase ProteinsAdultAgedAttentionCarrier ProteinsCognitionDiet, High-FatDouble-Blind MethodEndotoxemiaFemaleHumansLipopolysaccharide-Binding ProteinLipopolysaccharide ReceptorsMaleMealsMembrane GlycoproteinsAcute-Phase ProteinsCarrier ProteinsLipopolysaccharide-Binding ProteinLipopolysaccharide ReceptorsMembrane Glycoproteinsattentionendotoxemialipopolysaccharide binding proteinsaturated fatsCD14

Identifiers

PMID32393980
PMCPMC7266694
OpenAlexW3024874111

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.