Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32393836›Full record

ReviewNature human behaviour2020

Using genetics for social science.

K Paige Harden, Philipp D Koellinger

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature human behaviour, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 66 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
66citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

66 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Bioethics of somatic gene therapy: what do we know so far?Current medical research and opinion · 2023
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Observational epidemiological studies can mitigate genetic confounding with a genetic relatedness matrix.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Psychometric properties of the Dating Violence Questionnaire for Victimization and Perpetration (DVQ-VP) in Ecuadorian population.Psicologia, reflexao e critica : revista semestral do Departamento de Psicologia da UFRGS · 2025
    Article
  12. Review
  13. The association between temperament and polygenic score for psychopathology from infancy to middle childhood.Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines · 2025
    Article
  14. Reply to Hirbo et al.: The need for large-scale family cohorts and robust analytical frameworks of postexome study.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. (In)effectiveness of Frame-Inducing Rating Instructions in State-Trait Research.Stress and health : journal of the International Society for the Investigation of Stress · 2025
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

6 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

K Paige HardenDepartment of Psychology, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, USA. harden@utexas.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1557-6737
Philipp D KoellingerDepartment of Economics, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. p.d.koellinger@vu.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7413-0412

Funding

Population Research CenterR24HD042849 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AUSTIN · PI HAYWARD, MARK D. · 2002 to 2016
$8.4M
Scientific & Technical CoreP2CHD042849 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI MARK D. HAYWARD · 2017 to 2026
$5.2M
Cortisol, Socioeconomic Status, and Genetic Influences on Cognitive DevelopmentR01HD083613 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI TUCKER-DROB, ELLIOT MAX · 2016 to 2020
$3.0M
Environmental, Genetic, and Epigenetic Mechanisms for Hormonal ChangeR01HD092548 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI HARDEN, KATHRYN PAIGE · 2019 to 2023
$3.0M
NICHD NIH HHS P2C HD042849NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD083613NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD092548NICHD NIH HHS R24 HD042849
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Social science genetics is concerned with understanding whether, how and why genetic differences between human beings are linked to differences in behaviours and socioeconomic outcomes. Our review discusses the goals, methods, challenges and implications of this research endeavour. We survey how the recent developments in genetics are beginning to provide social scientists with a powerful new toolbox they can use to better understand environmental effects, and we illustrate this with several substantive examples. Furthermore, we examine how medical research can benefit from genetic insights into social-scientific outcomes and vice versa. Finally, we discuss the ethical challenges of this work and clarify several common misunderstandings and misinterpretations of genetic research on individual differences.

Indexed as

Human GeneticsGenome-Wide Association StudyHumansMultifactorial InheritancePsychology, SocialSocial MobilitySocial Sciences

Identifiers

PMID32393836
PMCPMC8240138

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.